107 vs 110 kit
Thank you. Heads with 2 into 1 exhaust or can true duals achachieve it?
After money spent and more money spent, listen to ProDrag or Scott at Hillside and get your heads done. You're looking at 20+% more power within your price range. Don't do what I did in the beginning of my build and try to go with cookie cutter components. Goto a builder and get the best for the money you want to spend. Also look at Head Hoggers. With 585 cams, I've seen 130hp/tq from a 107" build when tuned right.
As for as your exhaust, a 2-n-1 may give you more power on the dyne, but if you're like me and simply like the true duals, it's worth the couple HP cost for the True Duals. Just my opinion. Keep us posted.
After money spent and more money spent, listen to ProDrag or Scott at Hillside and get your heads done. You're looking at 20+% more power within your price range. Don't do what I did in the beginning of my build and try to go with cookie cutter components. Goto a builder and get the best for the money you want to spend. Also look at Head Hoggers. With 585 cams, I've seen 130hp/tq from a 107" build when tuned right.
As for as your exhaust, a 2-n-1 may give you more power on the dyne, but if you're like me and simply like the true duals, it's worth the couple HP cost for the True Duals. Just my opinion. Keep us posted.
Thank you. I had talked to Scott at Hillside and he did bring up crank issues when pushing that much power on the older Harley's 02-07. So I can see the possibility of this turning into even more of a money issue.
The name of the game is power to the rear wheel. That's the rush we're all chasing. Building the motor is only one way to improve this. The other is changing the gearing that's way too tall for anything but highway cruising. It takes an awful lot of horsepower/torque from the engine to make up for gearing that's too tall.
Your cams aren't the greatest for off the line acceleration or peak torque. But with the right gearing, they would work great.
There's more than one way to change the gearing too. Primary or final.
For a fraction of the cost, you'd be surprised what the right gearing would do for an engine with mediocre power.
There's some way bigger engine builds here that would struggle to keep up with the quickness of a properly geared bike with less hp/torque from the engine.
Leave the 103(unless it's tired), do some headwork, change the gearing, and you'll have one of the quickest bikes light to light and in the twisties that thousands of dollars in engine work will struggle to keep up with.
Anyone who races will tell you gearing is everything. I've contemplated the same things you are and the gearing change was the best thing I could've done.
Just my
Last edited by 60Gunner; Jun 15, 2021 at 10:11 AM.
The name of the game is power to the rear wheel. That's the rush we're all chasing. Building the motor is only one way to improve this. The other is changing the gearing that's way too tall for anything but highway cruising. It takes an awful lot of horsepower/torque from the engine to make up for gearing that's too tall.
Your cams aren't the greatest for off the line acceleration or peak torque. But with the right gearing, they would work great.
There's more than one way to change the gearing too. Primary or final.
For a fraction of the cost, you'd be surprised what the right gearing would do for an engine with mediocre power.
There's some way bigger engine builds here that would struggle to keep up with the quickness of a properly geared bike with less hp/torque from the engine.
Leave the 103(unless it's tired), do some headwork, change the gearing, and you'll have one of the quickest bikes light to light and in the twisties that thousands of dollars in engine work will struggle to keep up with.
Anyone who races will tell you gearing is everything. I've contemplated the same things you are and the gearing change was the best thing I could've done.
Just my
I am not going to engage 60Gunner in a gearing discussion; been there, done that. Gearing for certain situations certainly makes sense; gearing for Bonneville is very different from gearing for the drag strip, so gearing has it's place. Having said that, you add couple of teeth to your trans sprocket with you current power of 100/105 and line up against the same bike pulling 115/120 numbers and you lose. You might jump out in front but the more powerful motor will reel you in and run right by you.
I am not going to engage 60Gunner in a gearing discussion; been there, done that. Gearing for certain situations certainly makes sense; gearing for Bonneville is very different from gearing for the drag strip, so gearing has it's place. Having said that, you add couple of teeth to your trans sprocket with you current power of 100/105 and line up against the same bike pulling 115/120 numbers and you lose. You might jump out in front but the more powerful motor will reel you in and run right by you.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I am not going to engage 60Gunner in a gearing discussion; been there, done that. Gearing for certain situations certainly makes sense; gearing for Bonneville is very different from gearing for the drag strip, so gearing has it's place. Having said that, you add couple of teeth to your trans sprocket with you current power of 100/105 and line up against the same bike pulling 115/120 numbers and you lose. You might jump out in front but the more powerful motor will reel you in and run right by you.
See and here's something that just pisses me off. I reached out to another builder that isn't far from me with the same question, 107 or 110 or something else. He says.....a 110 kit would require machining the crank and in that case recommends a crate motor. Wtf. Who the **** can you trust now a days. Everyone has something different to say !











