When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
Hey guys. Well its finally time, my cam chain tensioners are worn on my 2003 flhtpi 88. I have decided to go with s&s 510 gear drive cams. I plan on using new s&s lifters because I hate the idea of my old lifters riding on my new cams. Im also using Quickee pushrods to save some work. My question is...
Is it really necessary to upgrade my cam plate and oil pump?? I plan on atleast upgrading the oil bypass valve. Any input is appreciated! Ride on
I'd inspect your oil pump and look for scoring/damage. If so feuling makes a nice bolt in replacement pump. A LMR-002 oil pressure spring would also help. The stock cam plate is more than adequate, I would also run that as long as its not scored or damaged.
I was hoping it would be fine because Im not going to hydraulic tensioners. I would think a better oil pump and cam plate would maybe be necessary to supply aftermarket hydraulic tensioners. Thats how I look at it maybe Im wrong. Thanks for the input
I am in the middle doing a 95 kit in my 2000 twin cam. Going with a fueling oe+ kit. Best price was on amazon for $365. Dont have a baseline yet but seemed like a decent upgrade over stock.
Hey guys. Well it’s finally time, my cam chain tensioners are worn on my 2003 flhtpi 88. I have decided to go with s&s 510 gear drive cams. I plan on using new s&s lifters because I hate the idea of my old lifters riding on my new cams. I’m also using Quickee pushrods to save some work. My question is...
Is it really necessary to upgrade my cam plate and oil pump?? I plan on atleast upgrading the oil bypass valve. Any input is appreciated! Ride on
What others have said, inspect and if parts look good, the OEM plate and pump is quite adequate. Having said that, suggest that the replacement tensioners are CYCO, replace inner and outer cam bearings and if going gear drive the rear cam outer bearing should be a ball bearing, not the OEM roller.
I would also suggest the S&S 509 cams in lieu of the 510 which will be a turd in a TC88 motor compared to the 509. The Andrews 21 would also be a good replacement.
If you need/want an upgraded pump, Drag Specialties offers a Daytona pump for about $150. If "upgrading the oil bypass valve" means installing the Axtell piece, not necessary. As others have pointed out the Baisley spring is good enough. Remember that the HD oiling system is operates on volume, not high pressure.
Do you have the OME service manual? Good luck with the project.
I chose the 510 over 509 because Cycle Solutions told me the 510 would be more fun than the 509 and their map for the 510s in the power commander V would be close to 30 HP increase. And I do have a Clymer manual which guided me through primary/drive belt replacement without issues
I chose the 510 over 509 because Cycle Solutions told me the 510 would be more “fun” than the 509 and their map for the 510s in the power commander V would be close to 30 HP increase. And I do have a Clymer manual which guided me through primary/drive belt replacement without issues
OK, good luck with that; I suppose it all depends on how "fun" is defined but you will never see 30HP increase with either the 509 or the 510; gotta call bullshit on that one. You might want to start a thread "S&S 509 vs 510 in a Stage I TC88" and get some replies from some forum members that have actually run the cams before pulling the trigger. The 510 is going to drop CCP a bit below CCP with the OEM cams while the 509 will boost CCP about .5 points, still low but better than with the OEM or 510 cams. CCP = torque and torque is what moves you down the road. From what I have seen on dyno sheets, the 509 will deliver a tad more torque and about 8-10 more horsepower than the 510. The 510 was designed for motors with at least 9.7 static; your setup will have about 8.5 and the only way to over come that is to select a cam with an earlier intake close to boost CCP. Do the math before you listen to Cycle Solutions.
No replacement for the OEM service manual and if you plan to keep the bike, pull regular maintenance and deal with the other mechanical issues that will come up, get the OEM service manual; the Clymer can't touch it.
Also find a competent dyno tuner and don't waste $$ on a map; it will get close but no substitute for a proper dyno tune.
Of course, it's your ride and you decide; just giving you a heads up.
OK, good luck with that; I suppose it all depends on how "fun" is defined but you will never see 30HP increase with either the 509 or the 510; gotta call bullshit on that one. You might want to start a thread "S&S 509 vs 510 in a Stage I TC88" and get some replies from some forum members that have actually run the cams before pulling the trigger. The 510 is going to drop CCP a bit below CCP with the OEM cams while the 509 will boost CCP about .5 points, still low but better than with the OEM or 510 cams. CCP = torque and torque is what moves you down the road.
No replacement for the OEM service manual and if you plan to keep the bike, pull regular maintenance and deal with the other mechanical issues that will come up, get the OEM service manual; the Clymer can't touch it.
Also find a competent dyno tuner and don't waste $$ on a map; it will get close but no substitute for a proper dyno tune.
Of course, it's your ride and you decide; just giving you a heads up.
Thanks for the input! I think those numbers are a little far fetched myself but I will report back with my results either way
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.