Softail Deuce upgrades?
I'm thinking about upgrading my '06 Deuce (Twin Cam 88) and have a few questions.
First, a quick run down of my plans. I need to check and replace cam chain tensioners/shoes, as a minimum. But, I thought I'd expand the scope a bit, because - well just because. ("motor"/"bike"/"racecar"...!?!)
So, I figured I'd bite the bullet and go for broke. Some things have good reasons, some might be sketchy reasons, and some are just for my experience. (I just want to tinker.)
Chain tensioners - starts the list, (project driver, remember?) - I hear good things about the Zipper's dual piston hydraulic pads.
Big bore kit (S&S) - well, just because. Is it too difficult to pull heads and cylinders leaving the motor in the frame?
Cams - Andrews 26N; I want a torque cam. Will this cam work well with 95-inch displacement, or can I go bigger and keep low-end torque?
(I'm not a wind-it-out type of rider - I like all my vehicles to run with gobs of low end torque. Mostly diesels now....)
Inner cam bearings - typical. (Torrington B148?)
Lifters - S&S; keep good hydraulic valve lift action, and oil to the top end.
New top end breathers; drilling out that oil return hole. (need to find a layout/diagram showing exactly which hole it is?)
Going to buy a set of Rock-Outs while I'm in it. Just to make sure everything is as quiet as possible.
Exhaust - Bassani Road Rage; 2-to-1, O2 sensors, keeps my wife's boot heel from melting over the slip-on. (rear peg between mufflers)
Plate/oil pump - want a better pump, reliable oil flow, no pressure fall off at idle. Plus, I have the softail, balanced B-motor - more reasons for the reliability and high flow. Not sure I need a billet plate, but seems the better pumps work with those - S&S, Fueling, SE, etc. However, I note that Andrews catalog states their 'conversion' cams won't work with the Screaming Eagle plate. Is that true for all the billet plates? Why would the conversion cams work with an OEM plate, and not the SE plate?
I think I could get a H-D OEM plate, and buy the Screaming Eagle pump - would that work? Should I put in a Baisley oil bypass spring? Or the Axtell bypass valve? What would be the difference in using an replacement spring (higher pressure?) and a replacement valve like the Axtell? If I use a billet plate, should I get a replacement bypass valve or spring?
Related to the cam plate - how do I determine if I need to block off one of the gallery ports in the plate? (or is that just for 1999 engines?) Also, how do I ensure that the plate I get has the passage needed for my B-motor balancer oil feed?
For cam plate and pump - do I just buy a plate/pump combo for 2007-2010 softails? (And I presume plates for those model years will fit the Andrews conversion cam outer journals?)
For tuning, I'm thinking the Thundermax might be a good option. But I'm wondering if there are any issues that Thundermax might have with control of the rest of the bike's electronics. Are there any issues with things other than engine control which the Thundermax replacement ECU might not provide?
Other recommendations for a tuner? Power Vision?
I didn't list basic stuff, like intake, pushrods, gaskets, etc. Plus, the cam chains, o-rings, sprockets, spacers, retaining clips, - more stuff. I'm going to try and make a detailed list of these, but lots of items are included with parts kits - so I figure I'll end up with a few duplicates, of gaskets at least.
I realize there are several approaches to a project like this - and the cam and support plate combination sort of determine each other's specification, from the inherent inter-relation of the two. So, I haven't nearly begun to develop a detailed parts list. That's the main reason for my post - to get whatever suggestions I can from HD Forums before deciding on my final route to the destination.
Thanks for any thoughts and answers you can provide, and thanks for reading through this!
Best,
John
i suggest skipping the big bore kit
Send your cores to a reputable builder for head work and boring / fitment of the piston that optimizes compression for the cam they recommend for your torque goals
Remember, these builders are not starting from a clean sheet of paper, they know what combinations give what results
I agree with sending out your heads and jugs if they look good still.
It sounds like you have put a lot of thought into this build. Have fun.
Yes to the 1999 question
Last edited by xcbullet; Sep 20, 2020 at 06:10 AM.
i suggest skipping the big bore kit
Send your cores to a reputable builder for head work and boring / fitment of the piston that optimizes compression for the cam they recommend for your torque goals
Remember, these builders are not starting from a clean sheet of paper, they know what combinations give what results
Most of the "kits" I see listed are complete with pistons, but they're available with selection of compression ratio desired. I don't really have a good idea of what compression ratio is best for my goal, other than I know it should not be too high for good street-ability. (is that a word?) 9.5 to 1 seem like a good target?
I did make a quick search for "engine builders". It appears that most of them will sell kits, including cylinders, pistons, and heads, targeted for a certain performance level. Do the "kit" retailers not match their bored cylinders with the selected pistons included?
I did not consider head work - thought the stock heads would provide a suitable performance for the increased displacement. However, if I'm pulling the heads to get cylinders off, it makes sense to at least treat them to a valve job. How much performance gain is realized with head work, compared with just the gains achieved with the larger displacement?
I suppose the engine builders can "pair" all of the segments of the build, to optimize gains with my cam selection, like you said. Do they generally perform work on the exchanged cores, or is it just a ship and swap type of purchase?
Got a recommended builder? Who's in the southeast US?
Thanks,
John
I agree with sending out your heads and jugs if they look good still.
It sounds like you have put a lot of thought into this build. Have fun.
Yes to the 1999 question
I also see that Baisley has a machined relief valve piston for the oil bypass. That should work well in a billet cam plate, no?
Best,
John
A couple of thoughts of the top of my head:
- Aftermarket BB kits do not match pistons to cylinders. I know many are sold but using one of the two above referenced builders will insure a true bore and proper piston fitment.
- If budget allows, at least a "street" or Stage ! porting job is well worth the cost. The '06 heads flow better than previous years but can be improved with porting. Both builders offer basic street porting as well as enhanced head porting packages but at least a street port should be part of the build plan IMHO.
- The OEM cam plate and oil pump is more than adequate for most builds. I ran the OEM plate pump on my last 95" build for 25K miles and gear driven cams with no issues.
- Speaking of gear driven cams, if given a choice between cam plate/pump upgrade or gear driven cams, gear driven cams is the way to go IMHO.
- Scott and Kirby may not agree with my all my bullet points but they will agree that the bore should be to 98", not 95". My '05 Deuce was 95' but is no 98"; night vs day difference.
- I am not a Thundermax fan. The Power Vision system is the most popular fuel management system being used by most tuners today. Many tuners are selling "licenses" so the customer doesn't have to buy the system which saves the customer; the savings will depend on what the tuner charges for the license.
- The Andrews 26 cam is a good cam but there are better choices; which ever builder you choose can help select a cam that plays well with the other components; very important to get this right.
- Whichever of these two you select can guide you on the purchase of ancillary parts and may be able to purchase them for you and include them in the "kit".
- You should get the service manual for your bike and figure out what "special" tools you will need or how to work around them.
Trending Topics
A couple of thoughts of the top of my head:
- Aftermarket BB kits do not match pistons to cylinders. I know many are sold but using one of the two above referenced builders will insure a true bore and proper piston fitment.
- If budget allows, at least a "street" or Stage ! porting job is well worth the cost. The '06 heads flow better than previous years but can be improved with porting. Both builders offer basic street porting as well as enhanced head porting packages but at least a street port should be part of the build plan IMHO.
- The OEM cam plate and oil pump is more than adequate for most builds. I ran the OEM plate pump on my last 95" build for 25K miles and gear driven cams with no issues.
- Speaking of gear driven cams, if given a choice between cam plate/pump upgrade or gear driven cams, gear driven cams is the way to go IMHO.
- Scott and Kirby may not agree with my all my bullet points but they will agree that the bore should be to 98", not 95". My '05 Deuce was 95' but is no 98"; night vs day difference.
- I am not a Thundermax fan. The Power Vision system is the most popular fuel management system being used by most tuners today. Many tuners are selling "licenses" so the customer doesn't have to buy the system which saves the customer; the savings will depend on what the tuner charges for the license.
- The Andrews 26 cam is a good cam but there are better choices; which ever builder you choose can help select a cam that plays well with the other components; very important to get this right.
- Whichever of these two you select can guide you on the purchase of ancillary parts and may be able to purchase them for you and include them in the "kit".
- You should get the service manual for your bike and figure out what "special" tools you will need or how to work around them.
I have recalled both Scott and Kirby posting in the forum - I will likely contact Kirby at Vee Twin Performance when I'm ready to start tear down.
My thoughts were initially that I would procure parts beforehand, and thus set my direction before disassembly. Counting on my typical luck, I figured I'd encounter too much runout for gear drive, and so I'd resigned myself to chain drive cams. Maybe I should rethink that approach - I can tear down and check runout before committing and shipping cores.
I've read that 98" is the displacement to shoot for - kind of surprised that 3" displacement change would make that much difference. Is it because the compression acts upon an increased bore size, thus increasing torque that much more? This is a hard thing for my mind to grasp - my thoughts are not mechanically aligned, although I do try to follow the math/science.
Exact cam choice is not a detail I'm fixed on, other than I'd thought the conversion style would be where I'd end up, given my model year and the tensioner issue. Perhaps I'll leave this to Kirby's expertise, and trust his judgement for a "torque" cam.
I'm open to use of stock HD cam plate, although I do want to ensure reliable oil flow. Bypass valve optimization will do all I need? Use the Screaming Eagle oil pump?
My reasoning for Thundermax was because it can use wide-band O2 sensors. The Bassani Road Rage system comes with the wide-band bungs already welded. I do feel that Road Rage is likely one of my better choices - not looking for noise, I like the 2-into-1 design, and I do want to get the exhaust below passenger pegs. Are O2 sensors not a viable choice for optimum tuning?
Have the service manual. Checking out the tools now.
Appreciate the responses,
John
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I have recalled both Scott and Kirby posting in the forum - I will likely contact Kirby at Vee Twin Performance when I'm ready to start tear down.
My thoughts were initially that I would procure parts beforehand, and thus set my direction before disassembly. Counting on my typical luck, I figured I'd encounter too much runout for gear drive, and so I'd resigned myself to chain drive cams. Maybe I should rethink that approach - I can tear down and check runout before committing and shipping cores.
I would not procure parts until the tear down and build plan were complete; the devil is in the details. Your call on gear drive but if run out is less than .003", consider it and discuss with Kirby for his opinion. True that chain driven cams are more forgiving if run out is an issue but if run out is an issue, it's going to bite either way sooner or later.
I've read that 98" is the displacement to shoot for - kind of surprised that 3" displacement change would make that much difference. Is it because the compression acts upon an increased bore size, thus increasing torque that much more? This is a hard thing for my mind to grasp - my thoughts are not mechanically aligned, although I do try to follow the math/science.
Main reason to bore to 98" is the extra 3" of displacement is free, so why not?
Exact cam choice is not a detail I'm fixed on, other than I'd thought the conversion style would be where I'd end up, given my model year and the tensioner issue. Perhaps I'll leave this to Kirby's expertise, and trust his judgement for a "torque" cam.
Pretty sure Kirby is going to steer you toward something with a very different profile than the Andrews 26.
I'm open to use of stock HD cam plate, although I do want to ensure reliable oil flow. Bypass valve optimization will do all I need? Use the Screaming Eagle oil pump?
Totally your call; the OEM cam plate still has outer bearings so IMHO quite adequate. However,the SE pump is not compatible so if you want to upgrade the pump, look at the Daytona pump; plenty on Ebay or Drag Specialties. No need to do anything with the pressure relief valve other than polish it up a bit to make sure in moves freely in the bore. Having said that, if money is burning a hole in your pocket there are OEM and aftermarket options.,
My reasoning for Thundermax was because it can use wide-band O2 sensors. The Bassani Road Rage system comes with the wide-band bungs already welded. I do feel that Road Rage is likely one of my better choices - not looking for noise, I like the 2-into-1 design, and I do want to get the exhaust below passenger pegs. Are O2 sensors not a viable choice for optimum tuning?
Again, your call. Most exhaust these days come with wide band bungs welded in; some just put them in different locations. Many more tuners are using the Power Vision these days than the TMax; both use wide band O2 sensors.
Have the service manual. Checking out the tools now.
Appreciate the responses,
John
I've expounded as well - in RED - on your previous comments below.
Thanks djl,
I have recalled both Scott and Kirby posting in the forum - I will likely contact Kirby at Vee Twin Performance when I'm ready to start tear down.
My thoughts were initially that I would procure parts beforehand, and thus set my direction before disassembly. Counting on my typical luck, I figured I'd encounter too much runout for gear drive, and so I'd resigned myself to chain drive cams. Maybe I should rethink that approach - I can tear down and check runout before committing and shipping cores.
I would not procure parts until the tear down and build plan were complete; the devil is in the details. Your call on gear drive but if run out is less than .003", consider it and discuss with Kirby for his opinion. True that chain driven cams are more forgiving if run out is an issue but if run out is an issue, it's going to bite either way sooner or later.
Will ANY runout in a crank pinion result in problems eventually? I'm not opposed to the gear drive, but from what I know about the chain tensioner issue, I'm thinking that cam, cam chain, tensioners, cam plate, and cam bearings (or lack of - for cam plate) are all interrelated regarding selection of exact part needed. (and dependent upon choice of each other) Devil indeed! Details? This is really the daunting part of this project for me - seems that I can't make any decisions until disassembly!
I've read that 98" is the displacement to shoot for - kind of surprised that 3" displacement change would make that much difference. Is it because the compression acts upon an increased bore size, thus increasing torque that much more? This is a hard thing for my mind to grasp - my thoughts are not mechanically aligned, although I do try to follow the math/science.
Main reason to bore to 98" is the extra 3" of displacement is free, so why not?
Well, the three inches is an additional 40% increase, over the "other increase" (from 88 to 95-inch). However, that 3-inches is only 3% of the total displacement, relative to the 98-inch final size. That's why I was thinking that it's not a huge factor for total gain. ALTHOUGH - the entire displacement increase for this considered upgrade comes from increased BORE, with the same stroke. That means that ALL of the additional increases - displacement, compression, etc. - results in extra force applied normal to the cross-sectional area of the bore/piston. This results directly in additional TORQUE to the crank. Thus, my rationale for why this increase should be more readily apparent to the butt dyno. (got math? - yeah, but that last bit sorta fell out of the calculator.... too many blotter tabs from my youth.....)
Exact cam choice is not a detail I'm fixed on, other than I'd thought the conversion style would be where I'd end up, given my model year and the tensioner issue. Perhaps I'll leave this to Kirby's expertise, and trust his judgement for a "torque" cam.
Pretty sure Kirby is going to steer you toward something with a very different profile than the Andrews 26.
And I understand that - builders would know better that I what works best. Especially those that actually get on the track and compete with work they've performed.. But - again - I'm still wrestling with the need (or not?) for "conversion" cams, seeing that my specific engine has the older 7/8-inch inner cam bearings, and I can go with bearings, or not bearings, dependent upon my choice of cam plate. (and choice of tensioners? or gear drive?)
I'm open to use of stock HD cam plate, although I do want to ensure reliable oil flow. Bypass valve optimization will do all I need? Use the Screaming Eagle oil pump?
Totally your call; the OEM cam plate still has outer bearings so IMHO quite adequate. However,the SE pump is not compatible so if you want to upgrade the pump, look at the Daytona pump; plenty on Ebay or Drag Specialties. No need to do anything with the pressure relief valve other than polish it up a bit to make sure in moves freely in the bore. Having said that, if money is burning a hole in your pocket there are OEM and aftermarket options.,
From all comments, I think I'll just use an HD cam plate, with OEM pump, and get the Baisley bypass spring, (and maybe the Baisley plunger?) Pump dependent on choice of cam plate? (thinking of SE pump, if applicable, or available?)
My reasoning for Thundermax was because it can use wide-band O2 sensors. The Bassani Road Rage system comes with the wide-band bungs already welded. I do feel that Road Rage is likely one of my better choices - not looking for noise, I like the 2-into-1 design, and I do want to get the exhaust below passenger pegs. Are O2 sensors not a viable choice for optimum tuning?
Again, your call. Most exhaust these days come with wide band bungs welded in; some just put them in different locations. Many more tuners are using the Power Vision these days than the TMax; both use wide band O2 sensors.
Power Vision would probably be fine too - I think I should investigate best tuner near me, and ask what their preference is. What other tuners use O2 sensors? Are O2 sensors preferable for a tune? Or not? (Questions for the Tuning Forum?)
Have the service manual. Checking out the tools now.
Appreciate the responses,
John.
Thanks to all,
John










