When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Engine Mechanical TopicsDiscussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.
I notice on closer examination that the power available at 2500 rpm is WAY lower than what an HD Stage 4 race kit provides, even assuming a restrictive exhaust.
Is it possible that the cams were installed mistimed?
Hello all,
I just finished having a 107' build I completed and the took it to have it tuned and run on the dyno and the number seem a bit low to me I was wondering if anyone had input as to why, or opinions on the torque curve I guess for the $$ spent I expected a bigger kick in the pants. Build specs as follows
107" plugged, welded, balanced and trued with H-beam rods, Hillside stage III heads, (10.3:1) Flat top pistons, Kuryakyn 24-d cams, with SE billet cam plate and high volume oil pump, SE heavy breather, SE 58mm Throttle body, 5.3 injectors, 4" Rinehart True duals, SE extra Clutch plate kit and heavy duty spring, tuned with a Power Vision
Thank you for all of your opinions
[IMG][/IMG]
something is amiss with this build and to me it doesn't look a head-flow issue. Looks more like a really bad cam mismatch. You should get Ed @ The Dyno Difference to look at this chart. He's intimately familiar with that 24D cam so he's tuned a lot of them in many different combinations so he knows what that chart should look like. I also tend to agree with others that a good 2-1 setup will probably help quite a bit on both sides of that curve.
Have you verified
1. no intake leaks
2. no exhaust leaks at heads or connection points
3. no oil leaks at base of cylinders
4. compression test
5. compression leak down test
6. cam is properly installed
this is my chart for a 103 with nothing more than Kirby's streetport and Andrews 57H cams, SE Ventilator, Fullsac DX pipe and Rinehart 4" slipons.
Last edited by UltraNutZ; Apr 11, 2014 at 02:31 PM.
Thank you to everyone and I mean everyone for the responses. I am going to triple check leaks on intake and exhaust! I have thought of the exhaust system issue with it being true duals but have done my research as well on the best systems. My question to everyone would now be if I switched exhaust saying the cams are aligned (I KNOW THEY ARE) and no leaks, what is the exhaust most would run?
I personally like the look of Yaffe 2-1 exhaust but worry about the power loss being that it is a short turn system! Rinehart would be my only other thought because I hate the Thubderheader sound and look. Yes I am one that wants looks and power realizing it doesn't always go together!
I have the D&D Low Cat (same as Fat Cat but tilted just a bit upward at rear for lowered bikes), on my 2014 Breakout with Stage 4 Race kit, so my setup is at least similar to yours. I am still breaking it in, so no 4 hour dyno tune done yet (scheduled for 4-19), but it feels and sounds very, very good.
A Supertrapp 2/1, starting with say 26 plates as a baseline, would be an outstanding pipe, as it can be tuned with that plate system, by removing, or adding to.
If something was not allowing a good amount of air coming to the engine, it would not have allowed the engine to be on an almost 45* climb to about 6000 rpms.
Scott
A Supertrapp 2/1, starting with say 26 plates as a baseline, would be an outstanding pipe, as it can be tuned with that plate system, by removing, or adding to.
If something was not allowing a good amount of air coming to the engine, it would not have allowed the engine to be on an almost 45* climb to about 6000 rpms.
Scott
The lack of low end torque and power is what is generating that "climb" (if you start at a lower than expected point, yes, the "climb" can be impressive). Harleys operate in the low to mid 2000s rpm at 60 mph in top gear, and that lack of low end torque compared to expectations versus a stock 103 is what is really troubling, because you NEED some power in that rpm range to cruise there. And, I would not say that an engine whose torque peaks at 3500 rpm and then falls rapidly is breathing well.
If it was the head, which it is NOT, it would fall flat upstairs. It does not, as the chart is biased in that direction, supporting evidence of the head working.
Over exhausting, slow response via tbw manipilation, etc could be contribuiting to the low end loss.
Only speculation, but the LAST on the list is the head, as it flows more than an untouched, 2" valve S&S Super-Stock casting.
Scott
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.