EVO All Evo Model Discussion

EVO Rebuild

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2018 | 04:30 PM
  #21  
Kingglide549's Avatar
Kingglide549
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,576
Likes: 978
From: Viet Vet, crossroads
Default

The tapered pinion is a better deal.
Dark horse should have told you that...
The stuff on it will not come loose like a straight round one will or can....BTDT!
2020 hindsight
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2018 | 07:48 PM
  #22  
Tony_N's Avatar
Tony_N
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 286
From: Buford, GA
Default

Originally Posted by 98hotrodfatboy
Ahh, the need for more is sinking in.... It gets us all sooner or later... Post up when done...
Will do Bob.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2018 | 05:59 PM
  #23  
Tony_N's Avatar
Tony_N
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 286
From: Buford, GA
Default

Hot happy at all with the effen results. 60.94 HP and 79.55 torque. I thought I would have a lot more than that with what went into this build! Needless to say I won't be using this shop again!



 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2018 | 06:12 PM
  #24  
Daedalus's Avatar
Daedalus
Cruiser
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 190
Likes: 25
From: Rotterdam, Netherlands
Default

Well, I take this is WOT run, so its not really street representative. None the less, that E/F ratio is all over the place. Not coincidentally, its at best where the torque is best as well. But it starts pretty lean and ends up too rich, so there is definitely room for improvement.

On the other hand, 108 n/m (80 lbs/ft) isn't all that bad IMO. What you miss is revs, or high torque at higher revs (== high power).
 

Last edited by Daedalus; Jun 2, 2018 at 06:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2018 | 08:19 PM
  #25  
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
Seasoned HDF Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 5
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 20,952
Likes: 7,483
From: Poolville
Default

Yea that tune don't look too good. With all you did to the motor I would have thought low 80's/hi 70's. Something ain't right... Sorry dude..
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2018 | 08:33 PM
  #26  
Tony_N's Avatar
Tony_N
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 286
From: Buford, GA
Default

Originally Posted by 98hotrodfatboy
Yea that tune don't look too good. With all you did to the motor I would have thought low 80's/hi 70's. Something ain't right... Sorry dude..
Yeah Bob! The builder! Thought it would have been a lot better.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 07:30 AM
  #27  
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
Seasoned HDF Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 5
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 20,952
Likes: 7,483
From: Poolville
Default

Have you ever done a compression test? I would to give me an idea where it's at...
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 08:02 AM
  #28  
1997bagger's Avatar
1997bagger
Seasoned HDF Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 2,090
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 98hotrodfatboy
Yea that tune don't look too good. With all you did to the motor I would have thought low 80's/hi 70's. Something ain't right... Sorry dude..
Agree on the tune, AFR's could be better, the 9.5-1 compression is getting flooded on the back end. Don't know what carb is on it but drop the big jet one, should make a difference.

Something else comes to mind is 9.5-1 is a good safe compression but 9.8 or 10-1 will make a EV27 come to life and just guessing but a .030 head gasket would of helped also if your at 9.5-1 now.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 09:00 PM
  #29  
Tony_N's Avatar
Tony_N
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 286
From: Buford, GA
Default

Originally Posted by 98hotrodfatboy
Have you ever done a compression test? I would to give me an idea where it's at...
I haven't done one since the rebuild. I guess I need to Bob.

Originally Posted by 1997bagger
Agree on the tune, AFR's could be better, the 9.5-1 compression is getting flooded on the back end. Don't know what carb is on it but drop the big jet one, should make a difference.

Something else comes to mind is 9.5-1 is a good safe compression but 9.8 or 10-1 will make a EV27 come to life and just guessing but a .030 head gasket would of helped also if your at 9.5-1 now.
Bagger it's a CV. I believe it's running a 46 pilot, 195 main. I'd been contemplating going with a HSR-42, but the tuner that did the dyno run doesn't think it's worth the cost / benefit.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2018 | 09:30 PM
  #30  
1997bagger's Avatar
1997bagger
Seasoned HDF Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 2,090
From: Ohio
Default

Mikuni is a little crisper and hits harder but it's a lot of money like the tuner said.

Next question, did the tuner feel it was acceptable to have WOT AFR's peek at 12.5 and fall off to 10.0? a carb is a prehistoric metering device but can still hold better numbers than this run, you have power left on the table. I've ran both a modded CV and Mikuni 45 on the same engine with a digital AFR reader and both could hold a consistent AFR during a WOT when dialed in.

Something else is a 16.0 on the throttle wack, that is in detonation area, need to get the bike to someone who is going to tune it using the good equipment unless this was just a numbers run, either way you have work to do addressing probable detonation area especially in Summer temps and the back end flood.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.