Comparing two FXRs
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Comparing two FXRs
Not sure if Classic Evo is the right place for this, but here goes. I'm looking at two FXRs.
This 1990 FXR looks really nice. One-family, two owners (father/son). 19K miles. They want $6K but it's been for sale a month+. It has lowered rear shocks and an FXRS tank, but the owner swears it's stock other than that.
The other is this bone stock 1986 FXR. Looks like a real gem. 18K miles, one owner, $4500 asking. Been for sale for almost a month.
So here's what I know and have been told:
The 1990 is a superior bike. It has 39mm forks, a better clutch, transmission, and I believe better gearing for modern highway speeds. It's also got better gaskets as HD corrected the paper gasket issue from the earlier Evo models. However, this bike is $1500 more and has been modified (however slightly). I'd want to unlower it and get mid controls on it. The front end looks like it might have been lowered, as well, but the owner swears it's stock. I'm probably mistaken on that, as I know some FXRs were made with longer/shorter forks.
The 1986 is also clean as hell with low miles. I love the mag wheels and the lower price point. I also love that it's a completely unmolested blank canvas. Ooh, and it's chain drive. However, the 35mm forks and paper gasket issue sort of bug me. More importantly, I've heard several stories of the pre-90 clutches going out due to the clutch release finger and roller bearing.
What do you folks think? And FXR experts wanna chime in? Are the bigger forks, clutch, and trans on the '90 worth the additional cost? Is the '90 as stock as the guy says it is? Am I too scared of the "issues" with the '86? Am I completely neurotic?
This 1990 FXR looks really nice. One-family, two owners (father/son). 19K miles. They want $6K but it's been for sale a month+. It has lowered rear shocks and an FXRS tank, but the owner swears it's stock other than that.
The other is this bone stock 1986 FXR. Looks like a real gem. 18K miles, one owner, $4500 asking. Been for sale for almost a month.
So here's what I know and have been told:
The 1990 is a superior bike. It has 39mm forks, a better clutch, transmission, and I believe better gearing for modern highway speeds. It's also got better gaskets as HD corrected the paper gasket issue from the earlier Evo models. However, this bike is $1500 more and has been modified (however slightly). I'd want to unlower it and get mid controls on it. The front end looks like it might have been lowered, as well, but the owner swears it's stock. I'm probably mistaken on that, as I know some FXRs were made with longer/shorter forks.
The 1986 is also clean as hell with low miles. I love the mag wheels and the lower price point. I also love that it's a completely unmolested blank canvas. Ooh, and it's chain drive. However, the 35mm forks and paper gasket issue sort of bug me. More importantly, I've heard several stories of the pre-90 clutches going out due to the clutch release finger and roller bearing.
What do you folks think? And FXR experts wanna chime in? Are the bigger forks, clutch, and trans on the '90 worth the additional cost? Is the '90 as stock as the guy says it is? Am I too scared of the "issues" with the '86? Am I completely neurotic?
Not sure if Classic Evo is the right place for this, but here goes. I'm looking at two FXRs.
This 1990 FXR looks really nice. One-family, two owners (father/son). 19K miles. They want $6K but it's been for sale a month+. It has lowered rear shocks and an FXRS tank, but the owner swears it's stock other than that.
The other is this bone stock 1986 FXR. Looks like a real gem. 18K miles, one owner, $4500 asking. Been for sale for almost a month.
So here's what I know and have been told:
The 1990 is a superior bike. It has 39mm forks, a better clutch, transmission, and I believe better gearing for modern highway speeds. It's also got better gaskets as HD corrected the paper gasket issue from the earlier Evo models. However, this bike is $1500 more and has been modified (however slightly). I'd want to unlower it and get mid controls on it. The front end looks like it might have been lowered, as well, but the owner swears it's stock. I'm probably mistaken on that, as I know some FXRs were made with longer/shorter forks.
The 1986 is also clean as hell with low miles. I love the mag wheels and the lower price point. I also love that it's a completely unmolested blank canvas. Ooh, and it's chain drive. However, the 35mm forks and paper gasket issue sort of bug me. More importantly, I've heard several stories of the pre-90 clutches going out due to the clutch release finger and roller bearing.
What do you folks think? And FXR experts wanna chime in? Are the bigger forks, clutch, and trans on the '90 worth the additional cost? Is the '90 as stock as the guy says it is? Am I too scared of the "issues" with the '86? Am I completely neurotic?
This 1990 FXR looks really nice. One-family, two owners (father/son). 19K miles. They want $6K but it's been for sale a month+. It has lowered rear shocks and an FXRS tank, but the owner swears it's stock other than that.
The other is this bone stock 1986 FXR. Looks like a real gem. 18K miles, one owner, $4500 asking. Been for sale for almost a month.
So here's what I know and have been told:
The 1990 is a superior bike. It has 39mm forks, a better clutch, transmission, and I believe better gearing for modern highway speeds. It's also got better gaskets as HD corrected the paper gasket issue from the earlier Evo models. However, this bike is $1500 more and has been modified (however slightly). I'd want to unlower it and get mid controls on it. The front end looks like it might have been lowered, as well, but the owner swears it's stock. I'm probably mistaken on that, as I know some FXRs were made with longer/shorter forks.
The 1986 is also clean as hell with low miles. I love the mag wheels and the lower price point. I also love that it's a completely unmolested blank canvas. Ooh, and it's chain drive. However, the 35mm forks and paper gasket issue sort of bug me. More importantly, I've heard several stories of the pre-90 clutches going out due to the clutch release finger and roller bearing.
What do you folks think? And FXR experts wanna chime in? Are the bigger forks, clutch, and trans on the '90 worth the additional cost? Is the '90 as stock as the guy says it is? Am I too scared of the "issues" with the '86? Am I completely neurotic?
I'm about 99 44/100% sure that FXR's went to belt drive in 1984. The one you're looking at either isn't a 1986, or it's not as unmolested as you think.
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Last edited by znicolay; Jul 20, 2017 at 10:53 AM.
Trending Topics
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 21,114
Likes: 7,638
From: Poolville
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 15,705
Likes: 22,718
From: Farmington ,MS
Some of the FXR models held out and used up the last of the enclosed chain drives...and people would toss the enclosure and make it just chain drive. As with most mid eighty's stuff, no real documentation...just what ever they had laying around to put on it that day.
Lot of improvements from 86 to 90...the 90 would be my first choice.
Last edited by Tom84FXST; Jul 20, 2017 at 06:46 AM.