New Ignition Curve...
So I had to go back to curve 2 but advanced the entire curve by 5*.. Didn't really want to do it that way but have no choice right now. I will say by running the motor like this, there is a very noticeable difference in power.. I really like it and so does the motor.. No detonation and the plugs look really good.. Throttle response has also increased.. I wanted a little different curve but won't be able to do that till I get a 2000p programable remote ignition module..
If only I new I could do this back in the day of "3 more HP" I might have hit my goal of 100/100.. Oh well, I'm way beyond that now because of the increase in cubic inches. Here's a look at the way the curve is now in the RED dots.. Each line on the pickup represents 2.5 degrees of timing which is the same as in the graph.. I might need to add a little more fuel but I want to put a few hundred more miles on the plugs to get a better reading.. Only 100 miles on these plugs.. Second pic shows timing on the strap and third pic show fuel burn..
The thing is being retired gives me a lot of time and when it's raining or the weather is shitty I get bored easily..
Last edited by 98hotrodfatboy; Mar 23, 2026 at 09:56 PM.
Last edited by 98hotrodfatboy; Mar 24, 2026 at 04:29 AM.
Trending Topics
Last edited by Rains2much; Mar 24, 2026 at 08:57 AM.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
In the context of shovel, I’m not qualified to speak about any other type of motor with this, I know everyone will say mathematically, my statement does not make sense. But the shovel hemi head for whatever reason, I always found responded better to stroke, then bore at the same cubic inch. For whatever reason the turbulence seemed greater with swept volume then with Bore. Heads that suck at flowing need all that angry turbulence in RPM to blow out and compensate for the poor head flow.
I’ve always been very very proud of being able to set up streetable shovels close to 12 to 1 and run on pump gas. And truthfully, most of these have been between 26 and 28° Full advance on anything from 93 to 103 in.ł. There’s no way I could do that with a dual plug set up. Believe me I tried over and over. To reach your compression goals you had to use a taller piston. if you had two spark plugs in there it lowered the compression, it never ran as efficient. The chamber was the key to raise mechanical. Lots of clay, dremmel and machining… tight tight tight chamber with low dome was key
flame propagation is a lot less of a concern these days with modern ignition systems and coils compared to the 50s - 70s.
You mentioned all the spark knock? Is there any chance that the cause is carbon buildup inside the chamber?
Last edited by Rains2much; Mar 24, 2026 at 09:04 AM.










