When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As I've been slowly reviving the old girl as cash permits, last upgrades to be installed are the new Ultima 1.4kw Chrome Starter and CYCLE ELEC 38 AMP CHARGING SYSTEM all from good advice from the forum.
So hears what I'm thinking bike was running descent last season but I'm wandering what a new improved over the stock oem igniton would do for my bike?
Keep in mind the motor was stock rebuilt from bottom up so its no high compression power horse.
I can't say that I understand the term remapping an ignition but I'm willing to learn if it'll help. I;ve read many times how you can adjust the rev limit to 6000 rpm but makes me wander if this is practical as I never go above 4500 rpm or so ever.
Ignitions that come to mind are I'm thinking the HQ-6000 programable , Crane or Dynatek's models and to tell you the truth like I said I don't understand squat about these and other ignitions although I have had great success with head quarters products and I put alot of trust into the guidance that was given from them.
What are there benefits or the problems that can be had adjusting each to a stock motor.
Please help me out here guys.
If your present ignition is functioning properly and the advance curve is close for the engines needs then an ignition change wont do much other than raise the rev limit. If the ignition isn't doing it's job or the curve is off then an ignition will help. An ignition will not give you power unless the one it replaces is not set up properly.
If you are planning future mods and think that you will require an ignition in the future and have the extra funds then it shouldn't hurt.
If your present ignition is functioning properly and the advance curve is close for the engines needs then an ignition change wont do much other than raise the rev limit. If the ignition isn't doing it's job or the curve is off then an ignition will help. An ignition will not give you power unless the one it replaces is not set up properly.
If you are planning future mods and think that you will require an ignition in the future and have the extra funds then it shouldn't hurt.
Very well put and point taken , only thing is its like riding a bike and you get so use to the way it is thinking its doing well and running strong then one day you do a complete rebuild and you then realize just how bad it really was. So question is how do I a novice when it comes to the advance curve lingual know if the stock ignition is doing its job for the rebuilt motor?
The stock ignition is somewhat lacking in the curve and rev limit department. If you are still thinking about changing it, you need to ask yourself this question and answer it honestly. "Am I going to do more work sooner or later. If the answer is later then all you reallyneed is a "Puking Chicken" (Screaming Eagle) module, which can be purchased on E-Bay for a pittance. However if you think you will be dooing more work then something like the Ultima programable module that is built by Dyna is probably your best bet for the money. Hope this helps.
I don't know how my International spec 1990 FLHS ignition system might differ from your US spec, but there is a good reason to consider changing your module. I used a Crane on mine. When stock, these bikes have various features to reduce exhaust emissions, also reduce noise output. These include an airbox that also functions as an induction muffler, as well as quiet exhaust mufflers. These are easily reversed! My ignition module had an advance 'curve' that held full retard until a certain rpm, to help reduce noise. Changing to a conventional module gave it a traditional advance curve and (its a long time ago) improved rideability up to around 2k rpm.
John is close to these things and might know if such a feature afflicted US spec bikes like yours.
Mine also had a 61T rear pulley, instead of the US stock 72T (which mine now has), so I know our bikes had to meet tighter regulations than yours around that time.
Last edited by grbrown; Dec 14, 2010 at 07:08 AM.
Reason: Expanded.
Thanks John and Graham. I seen the replies to this thread this morning and thought this is solid advice and I better sleep on it before replying.
So the motor is completely rebuilt including the upgraded cam for a bit of performance boost, so no I can't see any changes coming to the mill any time soon. John your reply "The stock ignition is somewhat lacking in the curve and rev limit department" is very interesting and was most of what I had to think about because I can't say I fully understand it and was hoping it would come to me magically , but... what exactley does it mean in layman's terms? Don't want to make inexperienced assumptions.
Graham I must admit I like the idea of an ignition that may reverse any government reductions, if that makes scence? I kind of understand the retard setup where as the ignition I think has the most get up and go when its fully advanced but correct me if I'm wrong the motor would run hot too hot if always running fully advanced.
Graham back in the days of riding the 76 iron to reduce rpm's on the hiway I changed the front sprocket to a bigger sprocket but can't say I've heard much on upping the rear sprocket, I would think this would add to the RPM\s on the hi-speeds.
By the way Graham I'm in Canada but I think the US and Canadian bikes are for the most part regulated the same.
Yes the stock US has emmissions built in, but in a stock motor the rev-limiter increase is probably felt as much as the change in advance of the street model module. The "race" module is different, it has an extreme advance curve and about an 8,000 RPM limit if I remember correctly. The export module has some severe restrictions for emissions. There is also a "Police" module that some have used on stock engines with air cleaner and exhaust mods that they say have worked well.
I just upgrade my ignition system on my '86 FLTC to a crane hi4e I got from John.
You can check out my experience with it in the link under my signature.
Quite the ordeal you went through, I talked to John on the phone for a bit and I think I got my ducks in line now. or at least I got a better understanding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.