When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Throw Singh Grooves into the head equation, that is going to make you stay awake at night researching for fact or fiction, some good engine builders use them with confidence of better mixture and detonation control. Research away my friends
Had to do it - the guy who has it figured out is automotive breath
we have a NHRA super gas car and that and back cutting valves is the only way to win - johnjzjz
Throw Singh Grooves into the head equation, that is going to make you stay awake at night researching for fact or fiction, some good engine builders use them with confidence of better mixture and detonation control. Research away my friends
Oh I'm researching (pretty sure I'll never highly modify the original engine in my bike if i want serious power than it will come out and a crate motor will go in.) as a gearhead who knows quite a bit about car performance and very little about harley performance I gotta say this thread is a great research tool for someone like me who in the future hopes to build some harley engines
Oh I'm researching (pretty sure I'll never highly modify the original engine in my bike if i want serious power than it will come out and a crate motor will go in.) as a gearhead who knows quite a bit about car performance and very little about harley performance I gotta say this thread is a great research tool for someone like me who in the future hopes to build some harley engines
keep in mind what ever you do the evo reacts like a stroked small block with a long connecting rod and a 64 CC head not ported BUT it has to use a weiand low rise open plenum and for the most part too big a carb - johnjzjz
Ok i will add this - andrews 27 cam evo BT -- lift is .495 ... so the S&S cam .561 lobe lift times ratio = 0.3452307 X 1.75 = 0.6041537 or .604 lift
I was following that ... but where did the .604 lift come from? I'm sticking with a EV-23 which is .498 lift as standard, and pretty much what the stock early model evo cams were like, hence .536.
I was thinking no more than a modest 45 thou off with 30 thou gaskets to keep the compression reasonable, not much more. Do you really think it will mess up the angles that much? I'm thinking not. My idea is to make it a little more porky, especially low down, but to avoid any of the hassles of going high performance. High speed/WOT I just don't ever use it.
Originally Posted by 1997bagger
Throw Singh Grooves into the head equation, that is going to make you stay awake at night researching for fact or fiction ...
Interesting ... I hate the guy's website, it's incoherent. All that "save the world" stuff smacks of desperation and indicates to me that the industry is completely disinterested in him ... and especially paying to use his idea.
I'd never heard of him before but we do similar stuff directing flame fronts around heads and creating tumbles and swirls in the ports. We move the plugs too ...
Last edited by Homeward Bound; Nov 5, 2013 at 01:43 AM.
I was following that ... but where did the .604 lift come from? I'm sticking with a EV-23 which is .498 lift as standard, and pretty much what the stock early model evo cams were like, hence .536.
I was thinking no more than a modest 45 thou off with 30 thou gaskets to keep the compression reasonable, not much more. Do you really think it will mess up the angles that much? I'm thinking not. My idea is to make it a little more porky, especially low down, but to avoid any of the hassles of going high performance. High speed/WOT I just don't ever use it.
Interesting ... I hate the guy's website, it's incoherent. All that "save the world" stuff smacks of desperation and indicates to me that the industry is completely disinterested in him ... and especially paying to use his idea.
I'd never heard of him before but we do similar stuff directing flame fronts around heads and creating tumbles and swirls in the ports. We move the plugs too ...
someplace along the way in the post someone was suggesting a S&S 561 cam i just added the info on it as a thing to compair
the head picture is interesring it is exactly what the 4 valve overhead cam ja p bikes have / a double lift in the combustion chamber but instead of it being flat, you have a tub i would believe the flat one makes more power but hemi's respond to almost anyting, when i was a lot younger the then top drag race guys did all kinds of things to them / they, tryed to them everything and still today, no one but the guys with more time than anyone else gets it wining gas of alky hemi noticed --
his politics aside we was on to something and i believe it was this ( on the back side of the compression stroke and during the power stroke to have set in motion a cycle to burn everything and end with the exhaust valve opening free of all HC ) now that has been achieved but not with the grooves only, but they do help with the speed in the chambers flame front -- Now i am taking about very high end race motors / using a motor dyno with a time element to plot the speed of torque you can see it -- johnjzjz
Singh grooves in a Twinkie head, do they work in theory? do they work in the real world? Snake oil? Modern marvel? 8th wonder of the world? 15 extra HP? Engine builder upsell? Crap who knows
Last edited by 1997bagger; Jan 26, 2019 at 11:57 PM.
Singh grooves in a Twinkie head, do they work in theory? do they work in the real world? Snake oil? Modern marvel? 8th wonder of the world? 15 extra HP? Engine builder upsell? Crap who knows
that head has almost no shelf - if you think about the speed of the Dwell time ( the time the piston is standing still at TDC ) what you have is a no starter --just my take we spent weeks doing this at a pro level and found in some ( SOME ) it has an effect but
Ok harley all of them have an over stroke / more stroke than bore and the dwell time is longer, sooo your combustion crush at TDC is longer --- a short conecting rod motor like a BBC w/ 4.600 bore X 3.76 using a short deck block gives you a short rod ability - you snap the rod off the top of the block you dont let it dwell and by using an asymmetrical cam you get the negitave wave to become a suction on the intake valve -- < in this case it has a an affect i guess you will have to take my word for it if not thats ok as well -- johnjzjz
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.