When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I bought a 1989 Sportster off the showroom floor in 89. At that time, if you hung around some old timers like I did they all rode Shovels that were in fairly decent shape. EVO's were always like red headed step children to them because they didn't leak, didn't sound the same, had belt drives, didn't have kick starts etc. At some point the TC will be the Shovel of it's time and we'll have come full circle.
I've owned three EVO's and would like to get another one just for posterity but I do love my TC88 and 96.
EFI Started in certain EVO models in 97, it was called the M&M EFI and had some bugs. In 2000-1 EFI was available on most models and changed to Delphi which works good. Carbs were available until 2006 but EVOs stopped on most models in 99.... That should cover it...
Ds
Actually, I believe that fuel injection was first used in '95, but only on the "30th Anniversary Electra Glide," a limited edition.
Renting won't tell you anything as it will be a stock EPA-Neutered bike.....you need to borrow a stage 1 or 2 TC to really get the feel of them.
I ridden a few Stage 1 88's and they are gutless off the line. I have ridden a buddies 2003 FLHS with a 95" kit and mild cams. It is pretty nice but barely keeps up with my evo off the line but will pull past after 50mph. Just don't like the lack of torque off the line. Don't know any TC guys anymore.
Originally Posted by soft 02
Nothing newer than 02. Dont know the FI question.
Agreed. The early ones have the good bottom so you can build em up pretty strong.
How are two cams better than one? On inline fours you have a intake cam and a exhaust cam that you play with the center lobe settings, and change valve overlap to improve on engine performance. On the Harley twin cam, you have a cam for each cylinder, so the intake and exhaust are still on the same cam, so what does it accomplish? There may be something, but as an old engine builder, I don't see it, but I wouldn't hesitate to buy one if I was in the need of a new bike.
My 1996 Ultra Classic has 78,000 miles on it, does not use or leak oil, and runs great, if I feel I need to go a little faster, then I will just ride my Suzuki, that doesn't happen very often since the local drag strip closed.
How are two cams better than one? On inline fours you have a intake cam and a exhaust cam that you play with the center lobe settings, and change valve overlap to improve on engine performance. On the Harley twin cam, you have a cam for each cylinder, so the intake and exhaust are still on the same cam, so what does it accomplish? There may be something, but as an old engine builder, I don't see it, but I wouldn't hesitate to buy one if I was in the need of a new bike.
My 1996 Ultra Classic has 78,000 miles on it, does not use or leak oil, and runs great, if I feel I need to go a little faster, then I will just ride my Suzuki, that doesn't happen very often since the local drag strip closed.
EFI Started in certain EVO models in 97, it was called the M&M EFI and had some bugs. In 2000-1 EFI was available on most models and changed to Delphi which works good. Carbs were available until 2006 but EVOs stopped on most models in 99.... That should cover it...
I agree but would add a 2 into 1 THUNDERHEADER is the only choice for performance and sound in an EVO or a TC... Although I am hearing awesome stuff about RB exhaust systems....
https://www.rbracing-rsr.com lsr21
I might try me on the FXRP EVO build.
QUOTE=Spanners39;12905853]I wish I still had a recording of a 2008 TC on Vance and Hines Short Shots.....you would never have said it sounded gay....damn thing sounded like it would rip your throat out if you did.[/QUOTE]
I agree but would add a 2 into 1 THUNDERHEADER is the only choice for performance and sound in an EVO or a TC...
Not true. Stock headpipes with the crossover with Cycle Shack slip-on mufflers can make better numbers and not have the 3000RPM torque dip the Thunderheader is known for. S&S, Bob Wood & others will verify this if you doubt me.
If you look at the chart I attached you will see what I'm referring to. The bike makes good numbers with the Thunderheader, but notice how lazy the bottom end is & that dip @3000RPM. The Cycle Shacks with the baffles opened a little would give better torque at the bottom without giving up any on the top. If you don't believe me google is your friend....;-)
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.