When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Everyone tells me that V&H short shots suck for performance and i should get a longer set of pipes to prevent reversion. So i look at some drag pipes from cycle shack and look at exhaust systems with mufflers and even the stock HD system. if you look at the pipe for the front cylinder on short shots and the front cyl pipe for cycle shack drags or stock HD theyre the same shape and stop at the same point right where the swingarm connects to the frame. So why does everyone say short shots are so bad for performance when the reality is theyre not that short? what am i missing?
Drag pipes suck as well. That is why. It also gas to do with pipe diameter and the fact that other exhaust systems, including stock have mufflers that are tuned to the system
Everyone tells me that V&H short shots suck for performance and i should get a longer set of pipes to prevent reversion. So i look at some drag pipes from cycle shack and look at exhaust systems with mufflers and even the stock HD system. if you look at the pipe for the front cylinder on short shots and the front cyl pipe for cycle shack drags or stock HD theyre the same shape and stop at the same point right where the swingarm connects to the frame. So why does everyone say short shots are so bad for performance when the reality is theyre not that short? what am i missing?
Do you want to make noise, power or just look cool? Short pipes are mostly about appearance and noise; they don't make power and that is why they suck. If you are not interested on improving the low end performance and/or just like the looks of the shorter pipes, run them.
If reversion on short shots were that big of issue they wouldn't make them for fuel injected bikes.As far as the comment about short pipes and power that really isn't totally true as the rpm range they make power is just higher than a mufflered pipe.2 into 1 pipes seem to be producing the most power at this time dyno wise.
What doesnt make sense to me is that the short shots are the same overall length as stock pipes pretty much. So yes i know mufflers are on the stock pipes but why is it that mufflers are better then just having baffles? I know drag pipes suck for street performance but nobody can really explain the technical or mechanical reason as to why its so much better to have a 2 into 1 or a big dorky ugly looking muffler hanging on the side of your bike.
What doesnt make sense to me is that the short shots are the same overall length as stock pipes pretty much. So yes i know mufflers are on the stock pipes but why is it that mufflers are better then just having baffles? I know drag pipes suck for street performance but nobody can really explain the technical or mechanical reason as to why its so much better to have a 2 into 1 or a big dorky ugly looking muffler hanging on the side of your bike.
Pipe length has nothing to do with wheter or not a bike is carbed or fuel injected. It all has to do with cam timing, duration and overlap and the pipes ability to flow the exhaust out efficiently to optimize cylnder fill. An explanation is a little more complicated than just saying " to prevent reversion". What difference would an explanation make anyway? It's a fact. If you are a drag racer and run in the narrow power band of WOT and the main focus is HP, unrestricted or minimally restricted exhast flow is what you want. On the other hand, if you run on the street or tour, you are more interested in low and midrange power in the 2500-4500 rpm range.
Pipe length has nothing to do with wheter or not a bike is carbed or fuel injected.
I think you misinterpreted my statement-----------------that was the fuel injected motors have a bigger tendency towards reversion than a carbed motor just due to design----------------------basically cams,heads,compression ratio etc doesn't have much to do with reversion on the grand scale.A set of 2 inch or bigger drag pipes will have reversion on a stock engine but might not on a big hairy cammed monster.Length of pipe doesn't matter but RESTRICTION does it needs to be just enough to stop the slinky affect the sound waves have in the pipe
I think you misinterpreted my statement-----------------that was the fuel injected motors have a bigger tendency towards reversion than a carbed motor just due to design----------------------basically cams,heads,compression ratio etc doesn't have much to do with reversion on the grand scale.A set of 2 inch or bigger drag pipes will have reversion on a stock engine but might not on a big hairy cammed monster.Length of pipe doesn't matter but RESTRICTION does it needs to be just enough to stop the slinky affect the sound waves have in the pipe
Maybe I did misinterpret and maybe I am still misinterpreting but to say that "fuel injected motors have a bigger tendency towards reversion than a carbed bike" does not compute at all. Furthermore, to say that cams (read valve timing), heads and compression "doesn't have much to do with reversion on a stock engine" is just wrong.
Every four stroke internal combustion engine has reversion; some more than others. Reversion is nothing more than the event that occurs when both the intake and exhaust valves are open near to completion of the exhaust cycle when cylinder pressure is greater than atmospheric and combustion residue is forced into the intake flow until cylinder pressure and atmoshpheric pressure equalize and the reversion flow stops.
If you look at the below illustration, it should be obvious that valve timing and compression very much affect reversion.
Not trying to start a pissing contest, just trying to clarify.
Reversion on a straight, no baffle, no muffler pipe always takes place. The idea is to measure the length of the wave length and have your pipes match that. The wave length is different depending on where the motor makes its power.Once you baffle etc. You break that wave.
3408pete all I can add is DJL knows his stuff. I have gotten some good advice from him for a few years now and he really understands the workings of these things.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.