Exhaust System Topics New and old exhaust system discussions. Fitment issues to sound bites and suggestions. Post them here.

Basic cam install question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 8, 2013 | 02:18 PM
  #1  
SniperDude's Avatar
SniperDude
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 152
Likes: 1
From: brockton ma
Default Basic cam install question

I looked at buying a cam from fueling parts and it says it can be used with stock pushrods and everything else.

Does anyone do this? I would like to install the cams without much cost as pushrods are over 200$ and even the install tool is 100$
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2013 | 02:35 PM
  #2  
GaugeMods's Avatar
GaugeMods
Former Sponsor
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 451
Likes: 3
From: 15443 Yale Rd Yale, MI 48097
Default

Originally Posted by SniperDude
I looked at buying a cam from fueling parts and it says it can be used with stock pushrods and everything else.

Does anyone do this? I would like to install the cams without much cost as pushrods are over 200$ and even the install tool is 100$
Yes you can use your stock pushrods. You have to take the rocker covers off and remove the rockers and remove the push rods through the top.

You can find adjustable pushrods for about 135.00 and you can get away with bending a screw driver 90deg to install the pushrod cover clips which you still have to do anyways so you can get to the lifters to hold them up while you remove and install the cams.

I think it's easier just to cut the factory pushrods and leave the top end buttoned up myself.
 

Last edited by GaugeMods; May 8, 2013 at 02:39 PM.
Reply
Old May 8, 2013 | 03:42 PM
  #3  
SniperDude's Avatar
SniperDude
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 152
Likes: 1
From: brockton ma
Default

I think I will go that route. Now im just trying to figure out what cam to get

I like the knight prowler ones. I dont know too much but im torn between the tw-222, tw-555, and tw-777 leaning more between the first two.

I ride mostly in the lower rpm range, 2500-4000 rpm mostly. What would be the best bet?
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2013 | 07:52 AM
  #4  
dsvracer's Avatar
dsvracer
Intermediate
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: danvanceracing.com Hampton Ct
Default

I have used the 555 and the 777 with great results. needs a little compression and ported heads will make the difference.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2013 | 08:39 AM
  #5  
RHillbilly's Avatar
RHillbilly
Road Warrior
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 8
From: greenwood, mo
Default

Call fuel moto or hillside both sponsers both sell woods cams and can answer all your questions
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2013 | 11:20 AM
  #6  
djl's Avatar
djl
HDF Community Team
Veteran: Army
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,763
Likes: 2,596
From: san antonio
Community Team
Default

The 222 would be the better choice of the cams you listed.

If retaining the OEM pushrods/lifters, take care to note the location of each pushrod and lifter and replace them in the original position. Due to manufacturing tolerance, if you randomly install the OEM pushrods and lifters, you could introduce some valve train lash that will generate valve train noise that you don't currently have. I know, sounds OTT but when you read as many posts as I do where someone changes cams only with no other changes and finds new valve train noise after the install, IMHO, it wouldn't hurt to mark pushrods and lifters as they are removed and put them back in the same place.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2013 | 03:55 PM
  #7  
target64's Avatar
target64
Stellar HDF Member
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,464
Likes: 50
From: Rouses Point, N.Y.
Default

I agree 100% with djl if your running in the lower rpm the tw222 will be a good cam for u. after I install the tw 555 cams after the first roadtest I knew it needed more compression it had a soft spot between 2000 --- 2800 rpms after that it pulls like hell.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2013 | 07:39 PM
  #8  
Hillsidecycle.com's Avatar
Hillsidecycle.com
Sponsor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,084
Likes: 829
Default

That cam wants near 9.8 cr to optimize, that is why those 103"s really get up on their toes with those 222's.
The 96"ers here get the Andrews 48's.
Scott
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2013 | 08:46 PM
  #9  
AllenW's Avatar
AllenW
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,571
Likes: 121
From: Mpls, MN
Default

Originally Posted by RHillbilly
Call fuel moto or hillside both sponsers both sell woods cams and can answer all your questions
Called Fuel and they suggested the 777 if I was having head work done, left me with the impression it was a pretty hot street cam and probably more than you'd want to use.

Also tubes can be held up with the little S clips you get on the chains of florescent lights and rubber bands.
Hook the S clip on to the bottom of the tube and the rubber band around anything it'll stay on.

Al
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2013 | 11:12 PM
  #10  
SniperDude's Avatar
SniperDude
Thread Starter
|
Cruiser
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 152
Likes: 1
From: brockton ma
Default

Originally Posted by djl
The 222 would be the better choice of the cams you listed.

If retaining the OEM pushrods/lifters, take care to note the location of each pushrod and lifter and replace them in the original position. Due to manufacturing tolerance, if you randomly install the OEM pushrods and lifters, you could introduce some valve train lash that will generate valve train noise that you don't currently have. I know, sounds OTT but when you read as many posts as I do where someone changes cams only with no other changes and finds new valve train noise after the install, IMHO, it wouldn't hurt to mark pushrods and lifters as they are removed and put them back in the same place.
I bought the tw-222 and the adjustable pushrods from fuel moto.

Was cheaper than I thought it would cost, about 570 with shipping, and now I can get fuelmoto maps for my power vision
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.