Why All The Hatred ?
Hmm, HD is debating the "real world' lean angle vs SAE measurement technique.
Last edited by ChickinOnaChain; Aug 27, 2017 at 12:46 PM.
Torque: 110 lb.-ft. @ 3000 RPM
Fuel Economy: 47 mpg
Overall Length: 90.0 in.
Overall Width: 38.2 in.
Seat Height: 25.5 in.
Ground Clearance: 4.7 in.
Lean Angle (left/right): 27/27 deg.
Wheelbase: 64.2 in.
Last edited by speedmastermotor; Aug 23, 2017 at 10:52 PM.
"Imagin' and 'cult' are very bad sales arguments with Homo Calcularis, being the new coming buyers on the market. "Outpricing" is one of the biggest challenges for the MoCo for the coming five years.
I just wish adjusting the rear shock preload did not require removing the seat and had a twist **** like some of the other new Softails. Still a LOT easier than on my 2017 Slim, However!
I'm actually liking the 2018 Low Rider too. Sure, it's not a Dyna Low Rider, but it's starting to look really good to me the more I look at it. However, I wish it still had dual disks up front.
The 2018 Slim looks great to me...even the pipes. But then again, I kinda like the Indian Scout's pipes too.
I'm gonna try and see them in the next few day and see how they look in person.
If after riding them I'm as impressed as some of the moto-journalist are with the '18 models, I'll be the first to eat crow.
However, I still don't care for the '18 Fat Bob, Fat Boy, and Street Bob.
There's something about the Street Bob in particular that looks very "off" to me.
Also, does anyone know if the Jiffy Stands on the '18 Softails lock into place?
The picture in the Revzilla review of the 2018 aluminum parts that replace the 2017 steel parts show the old and new Jiffy Stands and they look totally different.
https://www.revzilla.com/common-trea...ine-kills-dyna
From the above review: "Harley-Davidson had a little show-and-tell session for us to show us how and where they stripped weight. On the left are two fender struts. The old ones are steel, but the new ones are aluminum. Next to those are some handlebars — same deal, steel was replaced by aluminum. Ditto for the triple trees and jiffy stands you can see there, as well."
Last edited by Timbo64; Aug 24, 2017 at 05:43 AM.
I've been a motorcyclist for over 30+ years. I've owned/ridden all makes and models of motorcycles.
And what I've witnessed is Harley has tried over the years to come into the "modern era", no truer than the V-Rod which ***** G was 100% behind. While it had some short-comings, it was a really "modern" version of what a Harley could have been. But the hardcore Harley owners didn't want that. They wanted a traditional/classic Harley. And unfortunately, for those looking at cruisers at that time weren't interested either as alot of people associate "Harley" with that stereotypical "Biker" lifestyle not to mention metric cruisers at that time were at least as good.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not slamming Harley, I love my Slim and hope Harley is around for a long time. BUT the indeed need to do something or they will continue to lose market share...
Personally, my initial reaction to the new line up was; "meh"... I wasn't necessarily impressed with what they rolled out from the aesthetics point of view. But the frame (Softail), suspension, and engine are really a nice step in the right direction and IMO, still retain the Harley look. Some people say you need to ride it before you decide. But IMO, if its not aesthetically pleasing to me, I don't care what it rides like.
For the most part I do like the new Fatboy. I say for the most part... as I don't really care for the headlight housing...
I was hoping they would roll out something that may appeal to the younger generation, but they didn't. Maybe they don't want another V-rod on their hands.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders









