Why are front single disc brakes opposite rear brakes?
#1
Why are front single disc brakes opposite rear brakes?
The topic came up in one of the groups I'm in on facebook - "Why is the rotor on the left side of a single rotor big wheel kits?" It seems the most accepted answer is that it balances the brakes between the front being on the left and the rear being on the right. I refuse to believe this because...well...sportsters. I've heard this discussion before, and once again the most accepted answer is that so it doesn't pull to one side when braking with both brakes.
I was wondering if anyone knew of any equations or any other scientific or mathematical facts to prove or disprove this theory.
Personally, I believe that its to show off the wheel when you're parked, and that since the brake rotor is attached to the wheel thats anchored down on both sides the force applied to a single brake side would be negligible to anything that the rider would feel (if anything at all). Even thinking about it in terms of a longer object - say a conveyor wheel or Flintstones car - does side thats getting the power move faster than the side that is not?
I'm genuinely curious and this has started up quite a healthy discussion at work (I work with a bunch of engineers) with torque-steer(acceleration is the opposition of braking) being the counter argument, but once again....sportsters.
Any ideas? Any discussion?
I was wondering if anyone knew of any equations or any other scientific or mathematical facts to prove or disprove this theory.
Personally, I believe that its to show off the wheel when you're parked, and that since the brake rotor is attached to the wheel thats anchored down on both sides the force applied to a single brake side would be negligible to anything that the rider would feel (if anything at all). Even thinking about it in terms of a longer object - say a conveyor wheel or Flintstones car - does side thats getting the power move faster than the side that is not?
I'm genuinely curious and this has started up quite a healthy discussion at work (I work with a bunch of engineers) with torque-steer(acceleration is the opposition of braking) being the counter argument, but once again....sportsters.
Any ideas? Any discussion?
#2
#3
The topic came up in one of the groups I'm in on facebook - "Why is the rotor on the left side of a single rotor big wheel kits?" It seems the most accepted answer is that it balances the brakes between the front being on the left and the rear being on the right. I refuse to believe this because...well...sportsters. I've heard this discussion before, and once again the most accepted answer is that so it doesn't pull to one side when braking with both brakes.
I was wondering if anyone knew of any equations or any other scientific or mathematical facts to prove or disprove this theory.
Personally, I believe that its to show off the wheel when you're parked, and that since the brake rotor is attached to the wheel thats anchored down on both sides the force applied to a single brake side would be negligible to anything that the rider would feel (if anything at all). Even thinking about it in terms of a longer object - say a conveyor wheel or Flintstones car - does side thats getting the power move faster than the side that is not?
I'm genuinely curious and this has started up quite a healthy discussion at work (I work with a bunch of engineers) with torque-steer(acceleration is the opposition of braking) being the counter argument, but once again....sportsters.
Any ideas? Any discussion?
I was wondering if anyone knew of any equations or any other scientific or mathematical facts to prove or disprove this theory.
Personally, I believe that its to show off the wheel when you're parked, and that since the brake rotor is attached to the wheel thats anchored down on both sides the force applied to a single brake side would be negligible to anything that the rider would feel (if anything at all). Even thinking about it in terms of a longer object - say a conveyor wheel or Flintstones car - does side thats getting the power move faster than the side that is not?
I'm genuinely curious and this has started up quite a healthy discussion at work (I work with a bunch of engineers) with torque-steer(acceleration is the opposition of braking) being the counter argument, but once again....sportsters.
Any ideas? Any discussion?
It's a myth. However there are many reasons a bike could swerve when using the brakes. ,Off the top of my head, loose spokes, broken axle, cracked top clamp, bearings, hub or some such major failure. Otherwise, it's a physically impossibility or manufacturers wouldn't allow single discs. Duals are for heat dissipation.
Last edited by mitchxout; 03-28-2019 at 12:41 PM.
The following users liked this post:
lh4x4 (03-28-2019)
#4
#5
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#10