When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I decided to give the MC III a try. I'm an American Elite fan. I don't have an issue with the OEM Dunlops, just ludicrous pricing at the dealer. $450 for a rear tire installed? I tried the MC II's & liked them for smoothness, handling & mileage. Did not like them in the rain & I ride the twisties a lot in Western NC. Prefer AE's. But when the MC III was released, & Michelin really emphasized rain performance, I'm giving them a shot. My Indy installed it for (on rear) $300 bucks. He charges $285 for AE & MC II's, so MC III is not much of a price jump. Got about 1000 miles on it right now. Put 500 on it riding to the Back of the Dragon two weekend ago. Performed great.
Last edited by BigDawgQC; Apr 7, 2020 at 08:24 AM.
If you like Commander IIs, I think the IIIs are a natural progression. I ran the IIs on everything for several sets. I didn't like them on a Street Bob, but the Ultra and the Glide -OK. I have just a couple hundred on the IIIs and like em. Ran some twisties and some freeway and they seem like a good choice to me so far. Can't comment on either, never had any problems in the rain with the IIs. I can't imagine that any tire is going to make much difference on a tar snake though. Sliding on a tar snake is going to be a factor, I would think, of the heat, the consistency of the tar and its materials and not so much the tire. Go III.
I can not figure out, how you guys with baggers that ride "fast & hard" can get 15,000+ miles out of a rear tire, when I use the same brand/model tire.
I'm on a bike that's 150 lbs lighter than a bagger, with no passenger, and I'm conscious of tire pressure (41PSI.) And yet, I'm almost on cords at 11,000 miles. And I don't ride "hard nor fast."
I don't do "jack rabbit" starts nor burn-outs. (Unless I enter a burn-out contest.) But that hasn't happened since 2002.
So, what is the secret, here?
(And no, I don't scale 400lbs, either.) I'm barely half that.
I can not figure out, how you guys with baggers that ride "fast & hard" can get 15,000+ miles out of a rear tire, when I use the same brand/model tire.
I'm on a bike that's 150 lbs lighter than a bagger, with no passenger, and I'm conscious of tire pressure (41PSI.) And yet, I'm almost on cords at 11,000 miles. And I don't ride "hard nor fast."
I don't do "jack rabbit" starts nor burn-outs. (Unless I enter a burn-out contest.) But that hasn't happened since 2002.
So, what is the secret, here?
(And no, I don't scale 400lbs, either.) I'm barely half that.
I think its bike geometry. My Glide went 16,000 miles riding my Deuce 2/3 that. The Deuce weighs 2/3 of what the Glide does. And it gets more abuse.
I can not figure out, how you guys with baggers that ride "fast & hard" can get 15,000+ miles out of a rear tire, when I use the same brand/model tire.
I'm on a bike that's 150 lbs lighter than a bagger, with no passenger, and I'm conscious of tire pressure (41PSI.) And yet, I'm almost on cords at 11,000 miles. And I don't ride "hard nor fast."
I don't do "jack rabbit" starts nor burn-outs. (Unless I enter a burn-out contest.) But that hasn't happened since 2002.
So, what is the secret, here?
(And no, I don't scale 400lbs, either.) I'm barely half that.
I am thinking maybe the the condition and composition of the roads has alot to do with it.
I can not figure out, how you guys with baggers that ride "fast & hard" can get 15,000+ miles out of a rear tire, when I use the same brand/model tire.
I'm on a bike that's 150 lbs lighter than a bagger, with no passenger, and I'm conscious of tire pressure (41PSI.) And yet, I'm almost on cords at 11,000 miles. And I don't ride "hard nor fast."
I don't do "jack rabbit" starts nor burn-outs. (Unless I enter a burn-out contest.) But that hasn't happened since 2002.
So, what is the secret, here?
(And no, I don't scale 400lbs, either.) I'm barely half that.
I get fewer miles on my Softails compared to my touring bikes (Road Glide and CVO Ultra).
I can not figure out, how you guys with baggers that ride "fast & hard" can get 15,000+ miles out of a rear tire, when I use the same brand/model tire.
I'm on a bike that's 150 lbs lighter than a bagger, with no passenger, and I'm conscious of tire pressure (41PSI.) And yet, I'm almost on cords at 11,000 miles. And I don't ride "hard nor fast."
I don't do "jack rabbit" starts nor burn-outs. (Unless I enter a burn-out contest.) But that hasn't happened since 2002.
So, what is the secret, here?
(And no, I don't scale 400lbs, either.) I'm barely half that.
If I get 6k out of a rear on my Road Glide, I'm thrilled. I wear the sides off well before the center tread because of the dual compound. Lots very hard accelerating, cornering, braking. I'm currently on Pirelli Night Dragons but used to run AEs.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.