The Evolution Engine-Why Did they Scrap It?
Thread Starter
|
Banned
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 566
Likes: 353
From: Washington
The Evolution Engine-Why Did they Scrap It?
For years, I've heard about how the evolution engine was the most well-made of all the air cooled v-twins. I owned one myself...a used '98 RK classic. It was a great bike.
I'm not in the know when it comes to the complex mechanics and technical specifics of the evo engine, but my question is why did Harley get away from something most everyone raves about? Why not bring it back, or produce an engine with the same traits, since it did so well?
Is it the old Chrysler slant-six theory...made too well, hampering the bottom line?
I'd like some proficient Harley wrenches to chime in and give their thoughts on this. Anyone?
I'm not in the know when it comes to the complex mechanics and technical specifics of the evo engine, but my question is why did Harley get away from something most everyone raves about? Why not bring it back, or produce an engine with the same traits, since it did so well?
Is it the old Chrysler slant-six theory...made too well, hampering the bottom line?
I'd like some proficient Harley wrenches to chime in and give their thoughts on this. Anyone?
Intermediate
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 49
Likes: 37
From: AK
For years, I've heard about how the evolution engine was the most well-made of all the air cooled v-twins. I owned one myself...a used '98 RK classic. It was a great bike.
I'm not in the know when it comes to the complex mechanics and technical specifics of the evo engine, but my question is why did Harley get away from something most everyone raves about? Why not bring it back, or produce an engine with the same traits, since it did so well?
Is it the old Chrysler slant-six theory...made too well, hampering the bottom line?
I'd like some proficient Harley wrenches to chime in and give their thoughts on this. Anyone?
I'm not in the know when it comes to the complex mechanics and technical specifics of the evo engine, but my question is why did Harley get away from something most everyone raves about? Why not bring it back, or produce an engine with the same traits, since it did so well?
Is it the old Chrysler slant-six theory...made too well, hampering the bottom line?
I'd like some proficient Harley wrenches to chime in and give their thoughts on this. Anyone?
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 21,173
Likes: 12,742
From: South Carolina
Well, they are both 2 cylinder engines......
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 546
From: Wayne County, PA
I think it had to do with going to two cams so the pushrods were at less of an angle and it would be less stress on the valve train. Twin cams can rev a bit better/faster and there is slightly less noise from the cam chest, cutting down on noise emissions. I remember hearing that somewhere but i can't remember where. Its a shame because the evo still sounds like a harley and the early twin cams had a few teething issues. The moco really messed up in 03 with the pressed together crank in my useless opinion.
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,053
Likes: 12,327
From: Arkansas
Trending Topics
Intermediate
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 49
Likes: 37
From: AK
I was thinking that the move back to a single cam from the twin cam was a pretty big reversal.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,332
Likes: 3,873
From: Upstate New York
Because you people werent happy with 80 cubic inches and 65 horsepower.
Theres a bunch who, no matter how much they have, they just gotta have more. Why else the constant inquiries about cams, big bore kits, stroker kits, headers, stage 1,2,3, and so on?
The Evo had reached the practical limit as far as displacement without a major redesign. As long as they were going that far, the MoCo decided they might as well change everything. Some things, like chain driven cams, were to reduce cost by eliminating the labor involved in measuring and matching cam and pinion gears. The change from a bolted flywheel assembly to a pressed flywheel assembly was also done to reduce parts count and cost.
Theres a bunch who, no matter how much they have, they just gotta have more. Why else the constant inquiries about cams, big bore kits, stroker kits, headers, stage 1,2,3, and so on?
The Evo had reached the practical limit as far as displacement without a major redesign. As long as they were going that far, the MoCo decided they might as well change everything. Some things, like chain driven cams, were to reduce cost by eliminating the labor involved in measuring and matching cam and pinion gears. The change from a bolted flywheel assembly to a pressed flywheel assembly was also done to reduce parts count and cost.
