evo vs current big twin...
Everything else - evo (due to my never owning a pan or shover, etc.)
I have had several evo's and loved them and love is an understatement but the way the twinkie runs makes it the perfect bagger motor. I will always be loyal to an evo with a carb and no baffles...
I am planning another build however and am comtemplating the 103" pan as I never had a pan and need one...
hey Dave - you related to Jabba or pizza?
Last edited by cowboy1; Apr 7, 2009 at 07:25 PM.
- probably better head design with a little tweaking.
- early cam bearing problems.
- lower end has shown some weaknesses with the flywheels scissoring on some engines, and main bearing set-ups some consider "throw-away".
- cam tensioners will always be a weak point, requiring expensive maintenance, or distrastrous results.
Evo:
- some years had porous cases.
- later models had what some call "throw-away" main bearing setups.
- lifters have been troublesome.
Solution:
- most don't keep their bikes long enough to need a solution.
- Evo engines seem to lend themselves to easier modifications, with more "user-friendly" options available, making them more popular with the aftermarket bike-building crowd.
I'm partial to the evo with a carb just because it's so basic. I think it sounds better too. Flame away, but I believe a stage one evo will outrun a stage one 88 twinkie. It could be different gearing or something I don't know about, but that's my experience.
My injected TC88 defininitely starts easier and runs smoother when cold than the carbed evos, but that's no biggie because the evo's aren't really a problem.
I don't even want to know what it would cost to replace the electronics on the fuel injection unit if it pukes. Right about then I'll be wishing for a carb on the Deuce, I'll bet.
I do know that the evo's are proven and long lived. By the way, the article said that the engine on the million mile bike had been rebuilt - about 250k miles between rebuilds or something?
$.02









