When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'll never forget the night after a Willie Nelson concert at a private rodeo arena. The Highway patrol was waiting at the rodeo entrance on the county road. When we got up to the chek point, my roommate opened the back door, leaned out and puked on the cops nice shinny black boots. We told the cop that he ate a bad hotdog and that he had food poisoning, but I'm sure that it was the fifth of tequila that he washed it down with.
Ok, so let's spend 40,000k on a checkpoint. Stop 3,000 cars, get 10 drunk drivers off the road, get a few people with warrants, and a few people with drugs.
Say we end up with 20 people. Meaning 1.5%. We just spent 40 grand and made a thousand dollars tops out of the deal. We just wasted 39 grand.
Plus I don't know about down in pittsburgh but up here they use all but maybe one cop on the force at them. Meaning no cops on the streets for all the killers to have their way, all the drug dealers to go about their business, robbers stealing from anywhere and anyone, etc.
There goes more resources to waste.
Or we can do the efficient thing, and in most cases bring in a surplus of money by using a saturation or roving patrol. Get those dealers, get those drunk drivers, get those idiotic drivers, get those stolen vehicles, be everywhere at one time instead of one place for hours on end.
Hell, they even use the helicopters when they do saturation patrols here.
If you want to be like the most of Americans and support idiotic wasteful things like this instead of being smart about it, then you deserve everything this country is coming to.
When are people going to realize just because people in power do something doesn't make it right, responsible, or worth it? They rely to much on their gut and beliefs than actually using their head. Well, I take that back because they might be using their head but damn this country is stupid. I learned more in 3 years out of school than I did in 13 years of it.
You obviously didn't graduate grade school to come up with a figure like that to begin with, so there really is no sense trying to change your empty mind. But come back after you lose a child to a drunk driver like I have and let me know if you still feel the same.
Problem being of course you legally do not have to answer any of those questions and the fact that you do not answer cannot be officially used by the officer as the cause of his/her suspicion. At my stop I would only crack the window enough to provide my ID, insurance and registration.....then the fun began. I had not had a drink in weeks, but I just hate this sort of thing.
I was pulled to the side for refusing to answer the questions. I am sure if I pushed the issue the officer would have just said he smelled what he thought was alcohol. Making friends and influencing people as usual. It would have been easier on all of us if I had just answered the questions and gone on my way. But, I just cannot do it.
Good for you. This falls under the "duty of civil disobediance" as far as I'm concerned.
The state trooper was disappointed last year when he pulled me over at 2AM and I had not been drinking or taking drugs. I did confess to him that I had over eaten a lot that day. He had difficulty understanding how a 68 year old man out after midnight was only getting high on the scenery and riding.
You obviously didn't graduate grade school to come up with a figure like that to begin with, so there really is no sense trying to change your empty mind. But come back after you lose a child to a drunk driver like I have and let me know if you still feel the same.
I'm sorry for your loss.
Your loss has hampered your ability to be objective about this topic. It hits too close to home for you.
It's like the Brady bill. Brady almost gets killed by Hinckley, and his wife thinks that all guns should be outlawed.
Nobody is saying drunks should be driving.....what were saying is probable cause should be used according to the drivers INDIVIDUAL ACTIONS.
Stopping EVERYONE and in effect "fishing" for a lawbreaker, is essentially saying EVERYONE is a suspect in a crime. It's a knee jerk reaction.
If someone's driving drunk...you can tell. I've seen more than my share in the last 25 years or so of driving.
~Joe
Last edited by traveler; Jul 26, 2009 at 12:19 PM.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.