Accessing DSLR From Saddle
The problem with the DSLR is that there is not good place to easily store it on the bike for quick access from the saddle. I'm not suggesting that someone should take pictures while in motion (I'll leave that for another forum), but it is nice to be able to grab the camera for a picture of a deer, bear, or topless beauty that's 50 yeards off the road. The Nikon D90, with 70-300 lens) lets me get some great shots.
I think I've finally found an alternative that will work most of the time. It is the LowePro Slingshot series of camera bags. As the picture below shows, the bag is on a sling that you wear like a backpak. With a quick tug you can get the bag in front of you and have access to the camera with the side access panel. This means I can keep the camera close (on my back) while riding in areas like Zion National Park or any of the dozens of great roads around me.

So far I've continued to keep the pocket digital in the center bag, and when I'm just wanting to get a quick "snapshot" off I reach for it. When I get to places where I know I'll want to use the DSLR I simply put on the Slingshot and hit the road. I can quickly pull it around while still in the saddle. And when I get on and off the bike it's not overly cumbersome, which means I can easily take it up the trail a bit without having to worry about a bigger bag.
For what it's worth, I've considered adding the LowePro Slingshot 350AW, which will carry a bit more gear. The biggest advantage is that it will give me someplace to put my Netbook as well. So I can dump my regular backpak I use for the Laptop and just one 1 bag for both DSLR and Netbook.

I like the idea of having just 1 bag for both Netbook and DSLR. I can put the single bag in the Tourpak (and lock it, for security) or easily carry it with me. If I only need the camera I just take the Netbook out (it is in a leather cover anyway) and dump it in the Tourpak. The 350 is not that much bigger than the 100, so I'm not really picking up a lot of bulk in the upgrade.
I'd be curious, though, about those who've used maybe a tank bag and a Slingshot. Any comparisons worth posting?
Last edited by doc_cj; Nov 7, 2009 at 02:23 AM.
Trending Topics
A 10X real doesn't get you close enough, plus I can shoot 5 frames a second(better chance of getting a good shot of that hawk in the field)
Never mind that a DSLR gives you more control of the shutter, aperture, and ISO.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
No, this is not intended as an ad, especially since I'm not capable of making any money from the post. I just figured that other DSLR fans who have had similar problems might like the post.
For me, photography and riding just go together so well. And I've found that using the camera doesn't necessarily have to be just taking snapshots. So the DSLR has been a great addition to the hobby.
I've not used the Zoom model, so I'll have to take a look at it.
More importantly, the DSLR offers control over the quality and composition that I simply can't get on a typical P&S.
I guess, in a way, it's all about whether you want a snapshot or a photograph. In some instances I just want the snapshot, and that's why I carry the P&S in the windshield bag. But for those times that I want to do more than just Point & Shoot, the DSLR is the only solution.
Again, for those that use DSLRs and want to be able to access the camera fairly easily and quickly while still in the saddle, I'd recommend the Slingshot. For those that don't ... well to each his own.









