Lane splitting
if it were legal, they'd just be another lane of traffic because everyone would use them
Rat1 - CHP actually worked to keep lane sharing allowable in california. That pretty much trumps any arguments you have regarding safety
I bought a new tire the next day. I wouldn't ever ride on the shoulder unless I had to.
But, no, I don't know if riding on the shoulder is actually illegal. But I've seen cars pulled over for it a couple of times while I was, uhm, in stop-and-go traffic.
I wouldn't lane-split. That's even more dangerous than riding one of them death-defying motorcycles that people say are too dangerous.
Maybe this will help you out RD...
§ 46.2-841. When overtaking vehicle may pass on right.
A. The driver of a vehicle may overtake and pass to the right of another vehicle only:
1. When the overtaken vehicle is making or about to make a left turn, and its driver has given the required signal;
2. On a highway with unobstructed pavement, not occupied by parked vehicles, of sufficient width for two or more lines of moving vehicles in each direction;
3. On a one-way street or on any one-way roadway when the roadway is free from obstructions and of sufficient width for two or more lines of moving vehicles.
B. The driver of a vehicle may overtake and pass another vehicle on the right only under conditions permitting such movement in safety. Except where driving on paved shoulders is permitted by lawfully placed signs, no such movement shall be made by driving on the shoulder of the highway or off the pavement or main traveled portion of the roadway.
(Code 1950, § 46-226; 1952, c. 666; 1958, c. 541, § 46.1-210; 1985, c. 481; 1989, c. 727.)
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I guess it boils down to some split,some dont and others cant.






