General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

springer front end

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-17-2005, 11:20 PM
fish's Avatar
fish
fish is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default springer front end

Want to thank everybody on help in picking bike. Dealer told me springer softail is better value because if you bought the springer forks they cost 2700.00 compare to deuce forks 830.00 He said Harly underpriced springer any thoughts.
 
  #2  
Old 06-17-2005, 11:40 PM
pococj's Avatar
pococj
pococj is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas! Ya mean there's someplace else?
Posts: 11,062
Received 1,211 Likes on 461 Posts
Default RE: springer front end

If'n yer buying a bike for value, yer in trouble already.

Seriously, if you want the Springer, get it. But understand it has limitations compared to a hydraulic fork. It is a different ride, not made for pushing in corners, requires more attention, and certain parts have a shorter life span compared to the hydraulic.

Sure does look good, though! And the Springer Classic is the best lookin' bike HD has made.
 
  #3  
Old 06-18-2005, 06:02 AM
98fxd's Avatar
98fxd
98fxd is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: denver via chicago
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: springer front end

springers are totally cool. if you were looking for cutting edge pefromance, you'd be buiying... well a buell i have not ridden a springer, so i default to prococj, but i think the old school suspension looks cool and is a statment about the kind of person you are. super cool ride! have fun
 
  #4  
Old 06-18-2005, 11:45 AM
pococj's Avatar
pococj
pococj is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas! Ya mean there's someplace else?
Posts: 11,062
Received 1,211 Likes on 461 Posts
Default RE: springer front end

I like the looks of the spring fork. Like the looks of a girder even more. So here's what I'm looking at for the 2006-2007 winter rebuild: http://www.youngchoppers.com/parts_eyr_lsff.shtml
I think one of these would look pretty slick on my Sloptail.

The only thing I don't care for on the new Springers is the fender. The Classic is OK with the big tire & fender, but the regular Springer just looks wrong. Springers should be fenderless! If I was getting a new FXSTS, the fender would have to go. But that leaves you with those fender mounts, so maybe a custom fork brace would be a functional piece to add.

Ahh, I'm ready to sell the house and move into the shop! Ideas, ideas, ....
 
  #5  
Old 06-18-2005, 02:08 PM
SPRINGER's Avatar
SPRINGER
SPRINGER is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 68,022
Received 3,269 Likes on 1,975 Posts
Default RE: springer front end

Howdy Fish, how ya doin? About a month ago, I bought a Springer. I don't know anything about the mechanics of the springer front end as opposed to the hydraulic front end. I don't push my my bike on the corners or on the straights. I just ride for pleasure. I don't really have much riding time on other bikes to compare handling of the two different front ends. I just picked the springer front end because I liked the way that it looked. There might be better handling bikes out there, but I'm happy with my choice. I like being different, and I've only seen one Springer in my area since I've gotten mine. I guess that it boils down to whatever makes you happy. Enjoy the ride.
 
  #6  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:16 PM
Serpentsminion's Avatar
Serpentsminion
Serpentsminion is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: springer front end

Greetings everyone- does Harley still sell just the springer fork kits? I'd like a set of black ones...... but I don't see them anywhere in their online parts lineups anywhere.
 
  #7  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:31 PM
DirtyDave's Avatar
DirtyDave
DirtyDave is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: springer front end

ORIGINAL: pococj


Seriously, if you want the Springer, get it. But understand it has limitations compared to a hydraulic fork. It is a different ride, not made for pushing in corners, requires more attention, and certain parts have a shorter life span compared to the hydraulic.

Sure does look good, though! And the Springer Classic is the best lookin' bike HD has made.
WHAT?? I have a 91 FXSTS with over 250,000 miles on it. What parts have a shorter life span???? Corners just as well as the 84 XLX and 2006 8-Ball that I own not to mention the many bikes I've borrowed!
 
  #8  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:35 PM
fj4069's Avatar
fj4069
fj4069 is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: springer front end

ORIGINAL: pococj

I like the looks of the spring fork. Like the looks of a girder even more. So here's what I'm looking at for the 2006-2007 winter rebuild: http://www.youngchoppers.com/parts_eyr_lsff.shtml
I think one of these would look pretty slick on my Sloptail.

The only thing I don't care for on the new Springers is the fender. The Classic is OK with the big tire & fender, but the regular Springer just looks wrong. Springers should be fenderless! If I was getting a new FXSTS, the fender would have to go. But that leaves you with those fender mounts, so maybe a custom fork brace would be a functional piece to add.

Ahh, I'm ready to sell the house and move into the shop! Ideas, ideas, ....
holy schnikees. 2500.00 bones for that frt end. that will look bad *** on a bike though. saw a springer softail over the weekend at a poker run i was on. bike looked sweet with that frt end, really stood out of the crowd.
 
  #9  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:39 PM
DirtyDave's Avatar
DirtyDave
DirtyDave is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: springer front end

ORIGINAL: pococj


The only thing I don't care for on the new Springers is the fender. The Classic is OK with the big tire & fender, but the regular Springer just looks wrong. Springers should be fenderless! If I was getting a new FXSTS, the fender would have to go. But that leaves you with those fender mounts, so maybe a custom fork brace would be a functional piece to add.
Springers don't need fork braces like hydraulic's do. They do make a Head light relocation kit that bolts to the fender mounts, looks pretty cool.

[IMG]local://upfiles/26045/B91D2EDE2FB14A7EBF0C299380949896.jpg[/IMG]
 
  #10  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:50 PM
bgismo20's Avatar
bgismo20
bgismo20 is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: springer front end

Got my springer new in 2005, it took a good 700-1000 mi to break it in, its the best handling bike I have ever riden, there is no problem in the corners except the floorboards drag, but you get used to that, it really is the most gorgeous bike HD has ever made! I think mine is a pretty good example!
 


Quick Reply: springer front end



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.