When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
pretty much, what you lose on one end, you'll gain on the other..
i think a accurate dyno would show the difference, or they wouldn't be able to tout a HP increase with a lighter flywheel..
i can't remember the name of the old farm tractor i saw a few weeks back.. it had a huge 3' heavy cast iron flywheel on it to start it.. you grabbed the top and got it spinning, which took some muscle, but once spinning it spun the crank with ease.
I wonder if not feeling the torque difference between the A & B motors falls into the same category as not feeling the torque loss caused by running drag pipes? I have often had people who swapped stock pipes out for open pipes tell me they couldn't feel the difference. Self observation when I swapped pipes out - I could definitely feel the difference, but simply whacked the throttle a little harder to compensate. If someone regularly swaps between A & B motored bikes, would the same scenario apply? Probably.
I would think a Dyna may feel a bit slicker when revving in neutral, but once running in gear, I can't see how the balancer will affect performance that much. These bikes are over 300kg. Thats what going to stop them accelerating quickly.
I have to admit that the Softail Deluxe is one beautiful bike. The forward controls are not too forward for me. At 5'9" the seat and floor boards fit me perfect.
The B motor turns me off to buying one. It's not because there is a small loss in power. I want vibrations to be at a minimum.
I also don't want an engine that has a bunch of expensive parts that can wear out and have to be replaced that aren't needed in the first place for an engine to run. Just adds weight and expense. Those parts don't increase power, or improve mpg.
So for the time I will continue to ride my son's girlst...... err I ment Nightster, until I can afford another Super Glide.
That was the bike for me when it came out in 1972 with a normal rear fender, and when I bought a 1978 80 cu in Super Glide.
As many before me I sold it because I needed the money. Glad I have my son's bike to use.
To ride I would even sink down as low as to ride one of them new Indians. Wish I could even afford a Honda Rebel just to go riding with my son.
I have to admit that the Softail Deluxe is one beautiful bike. The forward controls are not too forward for me. At 5'9" the seat and floor boards fit me perfect.
The B motor turns me off to buying one. It's not because there is a small loss in power. I want vibrations to be at a minimum.
I also don't want an engine that has a bunch of expensive parts that can wear out and have to be replaced that aren't needed in the first place for an engine to run. Just adds weight and expense. Those parts don't increase power, or improve mpg.
So for the time I will continue to ride my son's girlst...... err I ment Nightster, until I can afford another Super Glide.
That was the bike for me when it came out in 1972 with a normal rear fender, and when I bought a 1978 80 cu in Super Glide.
As many before me I sold it because I needed the money. Glad I have my son's bike to use.
To ride I would even sink down as low as to ride one of them new Indians. Wish I could even afford a Honda Rebel just to go riding with my son.
However I draw the line with them Victory's.
OK, so on the first page, you call the Softails a "poser bike" then come to find out you don't even own a harley ? oh, but you "used too" back in the day ? makes sense now ... just another person on the interenet, that knows everything there is to know about everything, but doesn't even ride. ..
And then you draw the line at Victory's ? does that mean you will never "stoop that low" ? why are they poser harleys ?
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.