When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
32 VID you sure have a low opinion of sportsters
I agree the 72 superglide was a cool bike but a 72 XLCH would easily out run it.
Sure sportsters are small but for good reason. In the 1950's Harley wanted a light weight high performance bike to counter all the Triumphs and BSA's that were entering the US market. If you wanted a big twin in the 50's/60's it came wrapped in a 800lb FLH and of course they were slow. The XLCH was the superbike of it's day. Yes inline 4's ended all that in the early 70's but sportsters remained Harley's best performing model until the V-rod came out. Yes a TC-96 Dyna will run with a 1200 sportster but it needs an extra 400cc to do it.
OK, so on the first page, you call the Softails a "poser bike" then come to find out you don't even own a harley ? oh, but you "used too" back in the day ? makes sense now ... just another person on the interenet, that knows everything there is to know about everything, but doesn't even ride. ..
And then you draw the line at Victory's ? does that mean you will never "stoop that low" ? why are they poser harleys ?
Originally Posted by 191185
OK, so on the first page, you call the Softails a "poser bike" then come to find out you don't even own a harley ? oh, but you "used too" back in the day ? makes sense now ... just another person on the interenet, that knows everything there is to know about everything, but doesn't even ride. ..
And then you draw the line at Victory's ? does that mean you will never "stoop that low" ? why are they poser harleys ?
I sorry you just found this out but I have made this known on several occasions here on HD forums. I've never kept it a secret.
I do suspect your reading comprehension level though. I do ride. I ride my son's 09 Nightster at least once a week, and ride it about every 3 weeks throughout the winter.
Just can't afford a used Super Glide let alone a new 883.
As to the Victory comments, I know Schumacher won't let them go by. As to being a riding snob that's not me I said I'd ride a Honda Rebel if I could afford one just to ride with my son.
For a person that is knowledgeable as you, you should know that people here poke fun at non Harley's first, then someone that loves Electraglides get on the Sportster owners. It's called ribbing.
32 VID you sure have a low opinion of sportsters
I agree the 72 superglide was a cool bike but a 72 XLCH would easily out run it.
Sure sportsters are small but for good reason. In the 1950's Harley wanted a light weight high performance bike to counter all the Triumphs and BSA's that were entering the US market. If you wanted a big twin in the 50's/60's it came wrapped in a 800lb FLH and of course they were slow. The XLCH was the superbike of it's day. Yes inline 4's ended all that in the early 70's but sportsters remained Harley's best performing model until the V-rod came out. Yes a TC-96 Dyna will run with a 1200 sportster but it needs an extra 400cc to do it.
Yes you are 100% correct. That and I will add to what you said about keeping up with the Sportsters "the TC-96 will run with the Sportsters" but has a lot nicer ride and can lean more than a Sportster. Even though it's only one more degree of lean angle, it's still more.
I was hoping to hear more about the suspension diffrences as I thought we were talking about Dyna vs Softail leaving Cruisers and Sporters out of it. Anyhow I'm just thankful we all have some great choises.
Last edited by RoddHarley; Sep 12, 2010 at 02:13 PM.
Wow, page 10 and everyone has gone way off track with my original question. I asked about rubber mounting softys and we end up hating Sportsters LOL. But, it was fun to read.
Hey Faber! Do you happen to work for Gibson guitars up there in Bozeman? Another company that features orange and black. I'd like to visit there sometime, might be a nice ride from NorCal.
No, but I've known people who have. Gibson says the plant is in Bozeman, but it's really in Belgrade, the next town over. Must be a tough place to work, as the turnover is very high and the pay is pretty low. They tend to attract would-be or once-were construction guys, and they also employ more illegal "day laborers" than anyone else in the valley. (Where do you think all these cabinet guys and finish carpenters get all those exotic hardwoods that they use in the vacation homes around here? )
The acoustic plant is not really set up for tours like their Nashville or Memphis plants, but a ride out here is worth it anyway, Gibson or no Gibson.
I like my softail, but what do I know, I thought Dyna's were xlarge Sportsters
Dynas and Sportsters do have basic similarities in geometry (and in styling, some models), but the Dyna frame is not simply a Sportster frame "supersized" another 10%. It is its own thing.
Originally Posted by PigInaBlanket
Are you sure the balancers don't take away any power from the bike's engine? It was always my belief they did. Not a whole lot mind you but still some.
Yup.
Originally Posted by PigInaBlanket
I've never felt any "jerkiness" either on the Dyna or the Sportster I had which both were rubber mounts.
I haven't either. Maybe that "jerkiness" is the factory-tuned EFI at low RPMs? Get that engine running higher in its powerband and it goes away.
If I ever rode a bike that gave some feedback/"jerkiness" as a result of the frame design......I'd get off in a hurry
"I sorry you just found this out but I have made this known on several occasions here on HD forums. I've never kept it a secret..."
Talk about a poser troll. You don't even own a Harley and you spew like a broken toilet. Get outta here ya bum! ("I sorry..."??? "I sorry..." ??? Who are you Dezi Arnez? What's your first language Honda-ese???
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.