Induction module
Now that they have ruined the appearance of the Ultra, with the Rushmore, I would like to keep my bike forever. Even when I buy a new tourer, which will probably be a 2013, I would like to keep my old bike.
Inventory is an expense.
Do you think it would make much business sense to maintain a rotating inventory of all parts for all bikes made for ten years, discarding (or doing what with) the parts that have been stored somewhere for 11 years as the newest year comes on to the shelves? What do you do with inventory that never sells?
This all sounds reasonable to you guys, for the sake of "customer service", but it makes no business sense at all.
If you choose to keep your bike forever, that's your decision, but why do you expect the manufacturer to incur recurring expenses because of your decision?
An informed decision acknowledges that parts availability will become a growing problem with the passage of time. Rather than accept the responsibility for that decision, you think the company should maintain a historical inventory just in case you need something.
Would you agree with purchasing every part used on your bike when you purchase the bike, putting them into storage, just in case you need one of those parts? That's what you're expecting the company to do!
Last edited by mmancuso; Jul 11, 2014 at 08:50 AM.



