When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
General Topics/Tech TipsDiscussion on break in periods, rider comfort, seats and pad suggestions. Tech tips as they become available will be posted here.
Was told that a cam for low rpm requires more power to turn the engine over. Any truth to this
Nope. Takes the same amount of power to turn it over as a top end hp cam when the corrected compression is set the same as the corrected compression with the "torque" cam.
it all about the having the compression set right for the cam.
Was told that a cam for low rpm requires more power to turn the engine over. Any truth to this
It does take an extreamly small amount of the engine power to turn a set of gear driven cams versus chain driven cams.
Higher lift cams require adjustable pushrods fill the cylinders more and usually have more overlap allowing more fuel/air mixture and time fire exhaust to escape.
Hurts bottom end and causes a coarse idle. Unless one is not satisfied with what a stock Harley does at WOT, leave it as is.
Raising compression, adding high lift cam along with increasing valve springs tension will require compression release for starting. Of course at upper RPM, you gain more power back. Of course it takes more fuel for that power. It's not free.
If someone had a bagger, two up and a trailer, they might consider a change to the drive ratio rather then the engine.
I know. ... Save someone the trouble.
Last edited by Jackie Paper; Aug 10, 2023 at 05:54 AM.
It does take an extreamly small amount of the engine power to turn a set of gear driven cams versus chain driven cams.
Higher lift cams require adjustable pushrods fill the cylinders more and usually have more overlap allowing more fuel/air mixture and time fire exhaust to escape.
Hurts bottom end and causes a coarse idle. Unless one is not satisfied with what a stock Harley does at WOT, leave it as is.
Raising compression, adding high lift cam along with increasing valve springs tension will require compression release for starting. Of course at upper RPM, you gain more power back. Of course it takes more fuel for that power. It's not free.
If someone had a bagger, two up and a trailer, they might consider a change to the drive ratio rather then the engine.
I know. ... Save someone the trouble.
If you don't have/need compression releases you don't have enough compression.
I don't see the bike listed or the specs on either cam. But generally, most cams that provide torque at lower RPM (when the cam comes on) typically close the intake valve earlier which increased the pressure in the cylinder. If you already have a big bore, high compression engine (11:1 or so) and install a torque cam, you could end up with some issues starting and pinging because of high cylinder pressure. With the specs for the current engine, you can calculate static compression etc.
The idea is that the cam works with the other engine components (pistons, heads, exhaust ans intake etc). Most cam suppliers will describe when the cam starts making torque and what engine it will work with (stock or highly modified). So if you have a specific cam selected and know the exact specs of you engine, that should give you a better understanding of how it will work with your current setup.
Generally, torque based cams close the intake valve sooner than a mid-range focused cam or a top-end focused cam, etc. All else equal, a cam with an earlier closing point, say 20 degrees ABDC, will translate to greater cranking compression vs. one with say a 40 degree close ABDC. As such, it will take more energy to fire. This is even more noticeable with kick start bikes, where a cam with a later intake valve close makes the bike easier to kick through the compression stroke.
Generally, torque based cams close the intake valve sooner than a mid-range focused cam or a top-end focused cam, etc. All else equal, a cam with an earlier closing point, say 20 degrees ABDC, will translate to greater cranking compression vs. one with say a 40 degree close ABDC. As such, it will take more energy to fire. This is even more noticeable with kick start bikes, where a cam with a later intake valve close makes the bike easier to kick through the compression stroke.
What are most Harley's like the TC line that have the original cams consider?
Ok guys , your mechanical knowledge trumps my comprehension. My bike is a 2017 FATBOY with a stage one. Everything I had herd here was pos for a 2 upgrade until someone mentioned the harder cranking possibilities which is where we are now. I guess the bottom line is do I want to spend the money with the possibilities of having something go wrong.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.