The new ST Version
A slight concern over a new facility taking on a new product, as bugs and mistakes seem to invariably happen when this takes place.
A twinge of regret at loss of domestic production.
A bit of relief that this gets away from the current facility and it's manufacturing or assembly problems.
Second, it's pretty much the same bike as the existing Pan America. So what's the point? And what I mean by that is, look at the BMW GS vs the RT, the RT has totally different bodywork, different fairing, different bags, everything designed to make for a better more comfortable on-road-only long distance touring bike. The Pan Am doesn't. It's basically just a regular Pan Am with smaller wheels and street tires (which will make it a better sport bike) but no improvement to wind protection (which would have made it better as a touring bike). In fact, the ST has a smaller/shorter windscreen than the regular PA. If I was choosing between them, as a tourer or sport tourer I'd buy the regular Pan America, even for just road touring, just because it's capable of things the ST isn't. If I was trying to buy a Bronx or sport bike, then the ST is the closest match to that that Harley has.
So good on them for recognizing the desire for a lighter weight street tourer, but I think this is just more of a parts-swap bike rather than what I really wish they would have produced, which would be a 475lb, 975cc, 28-inch seat, full fairing, belt-drive sport tourer. Something more like the Triumph Tiger 900 GT, but with wind protection more like the BMW RT. I'm picturing something more like their huge hit Low Rider ST, but a Rev Max based bike that's 225 pounds less weight while still having the same HP as the LRST. That's what I was hoping they would produce. I think it would be an out of the park home run for Harley as it'd probably be much more appealing to new riders/new to the brand, and I bet a whole lot of aging riders would be very very interested in a Harley touring bike that weighed 500 pounds instead of the >900 lbs of the Ultra. I may be nuts, but I think people would line up around the block for something like that. I think the existing Pan America ST might increase overall Pan Am sales by maybe 10%, but the 975ST (as I'll call it) would probably increase Pan Am sales by 1,000%.
EDIT: actually, maybe the Pan Am is the wrong bike to start from; maybe they should make what I'm talking about as a "Nightster ST"; just add a fairing and some bags like they did to the Low Rider (and a Sundowner) and you're pretty much there. It's even belt drive already, and they already offer a Sundowner and some detachable bags (a little small at about 20L each but they look good). That bike might be pretty interesting. And if they made the fairing with some bodywork, they could cover up a lot of the left side of the engine that everyone complains about... I wish it had the 110hp of the Bronx, but 91 is not a slouch. I wonder if Klockwerx would make a Nightster S bracket for the Wedge fairing?
Dang, I had no interest in the Nightster at all, and now I kinda got the itch to built a Nightster ST...
So look at Yamaha... I certainly have... R1/9/6, XSR 9/7, MT-01/9/6, Tracer 9, Tenre 7.. . The entire line up. Wide variation with minor tweaks of common engines and platforms to offer variety. HD just launched Rev Max in the Pan Am series and sporster/nightster... And quite limited offerings up to now.
I have a LRST. It's my baby bagger. I'll never own a bagger. It's what I will ride on trips. I don't need another one with a Rev Max. If there was one, I would not swap to it.
Sportster/Nightster is exactly the platform they need to develop. I hate the Sporster. A goofy Un ergo Boulevard bike. That needs to be a sports bike. As sporty as HD wants to go. Nightster is really cool, light... They need one with a 1250 Brembos and Ohlins.
The Pan Am is the ADV bike, and a platform that can have wide variety. The Honda, Yamaha, and Kawis I've looked at ALL have chain drives. This PAST is/or can be direct competitor to all the sporty tall rounders/sport tourer out there. That is the Pan Am platform... Develop a naked, a ST, a street/ADV... All of it. The softail platform is what it is, and the sportster/nightster platform is what it is.
Do I wish it had a belt... Don't care. I can convert it, just like I can convert my LRST to chain. I just had to replace my belt prematurely. Don't know why. 25k miles, missing 3 teeth. $700. It ate something, or it was a defect. Is what it is. That sucked. Every single bike I look at that the PAST is competing against has a chain.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that we judge the bike offered by HD with boxes it checks and doesn't check. But it is a very young product line, where as all the other companies it is their long standing bread and butter. In order for HD to expand and develop both product lines, they have to have sales and demand. Only time will tell if that happens. They have very strong offerings. To me the Sporster/Nightster line needs the most work... But that would also be the strongest competition. The upright all rounder is very hot right now, and Kudos to HD for trying to capture market share. So far... With CVO, special, ST... I think they are making strong offerings in a highly competitive market. Everything they offer, will not check every box, for everybody.
To me, the biggest swing and a miss is the Sporster. I never seen them. Don't know who it's made for... We won't ever bother discussing live wire. The PAST is a huge step in the right direction... At least to me.
Last edited by Powermankw; Apr 1, 2026 at 01:12 PM.
Given a choice, I would still rather give my money to an American company over foreign regardless what is made overseas.









