Fatboy/HP/torque?
ORIGINAL: mentor70
here is a Head quarters 95, similar to thebuild that I have.
10.5 compresion, ported heads, .575 GD cams, 2 to 1 thunderheader.
Mikuni 42, with HQ ignition
here is a Head quarters 95, similar to thebuild that I have.
10.5 compresion, ported heads, .575 GD cams, 2 to 1 thunderheader.
Mikuni 42, with HQ ignition
Chris
ORIGINAL: RiggidyRaw
You were right about compression. Less wear and tear on the engine.Lower compression is always a good choice if it gets you the results you want.
You were right about compression. Less wear and tear on the engine.Lower compression is always a good choice if it gets you the results you want.
Hi-Have 07 Fatboy, I am running V&H pipes staggered big shots and SE A/C and SERT with dyno tune by stealer at 1K miles Max power is 74.21 and Max Torque is 84.21 A/Fuel 13.3 approx
run condition was 72 degrees 28 .00in Hg Humidity 15% SAE 1.05
ORIGINAL: RiggidyRaw
You were right about compression. Less wear and tear on the engine.Lower compression is always a good choice if it gets you the results you want.
You were right about compression. Less wear and tear on the engine.Lower compression is always a good choice if it gets you the results you want.
I dont think one point of compresion means jack on wear and tear, its all in the tune and the maintance that follows.
The choice in your builder/machinist and parts selection has a dominant factor here too!
ORIGINAL: mentor70
here is a Head quarters 95, similar to thebuild that I have.
10.5 compresion, ported heads, .575 GD cams, 2 to 1 thunderheader.
Mikuni 42, with HQ ignition
here is a Head quarters 95, similar to thebuild that I have.
10.5 compresion, ported heads, .575 GD cams, 2 to 1 thunderheader.
Mikuni 42, with HQ ignition


