Opinions on these Dyno Numbers
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,156
Likes: 41
From: So Cal
New numbers:
76.85 hp 92.20 tq
That's more what I was expecting from what I've seen on the forum of other similar builds. I'm sure I could do even better with a good 2 into 1 exhaust, but for now I'll stick with the true duals. The builder was great about this. No cost to me for the fix or re-tune. I'll be picking it up tomorrow. I got a faxed copy of the dyno sheet but it is in mph instead of rpm's. I'm gonna get a reprint in rpm's and will post.
76.85 hp 92.20 tq
That's more what I was expecting from what I've seen on the forum of other similar builds. I'm sure I could do even better with a good 2 into 1 exhaust, but for now I'll stick with the true duals. The builder was great about this. No cost to me for the fix or re-tune. I'll be picking it up tomorrow. I got a faxed copy of the dyno sheet but it is in mph instead of rpm's. I'm gonna get a reprint in rpm's and will post.
Have you ridden it , its got to feel like a different bike now!
Last edited by XARAN; Jun 8, 2010 at 11:28 AM.
Tourer
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 259
Likes: 1
From: Kansas City, MO
Sorry didnt read the whole thread... what was done with your heads?? if nothing then your comrpession isnt that high. that setup with flat tops would be somewhere between 8.9 and 9. Thats pretty low to build power. Headwork needs to be adressed ASAP, and definitely a differant pipe setup. my 95" with SS 570s and custom headwork at 9.8 with a pro pipe made 99 hp 104 tq.
Cruiser
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: moreau ny
Your air to fuel mixture is way off . Look at the red line fall on its face at around 3500, right where everything else does. The red and blue lines should be togther as close as possible, you might be running really rich. example; look at hspring03 dyno sheets
Last edited by fat15th; Jun 8, 2010 at 10:10 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
anubisss
General Harley Davidson Chat
3
Jun 29, 2009 01:07 PM
