Se 204
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 392
Likes: 12
Se 204
Decided to change cams while the tensioner was being changed. Decided on the SE 204. The part number in the HD catalog is 25464-06. I got a pretty good deal on the cams.
The question I have is the box says "fits '06 later Dyna Models and '07 later softail and touring", will this cam work with a '03 Fatboy 88 inch motor?
The question I have is the box says "fits '06 later Dyna Models and '07 later softail and touring", will this cam work with a '03 Fatboy 88 inch motor?
According to the research I've done you need p/n 25149-00. The reason I know this is because I've been looking for the cams you bought 25464-06 on E-Bay. The only ones I've found are the ones that fit yours. PM me if you decide to sell.
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 392
Likes: 12
I am not doubting your research, I found the same thing on eBay. I do know that HD has been known to change part numbers.
Is this still true if you are upgrading to the SE hydraulic tensioner and oil pump? My local dealer even said the p/n 25464-06 were the correct cams. Are the cams different or has the part number just been changed?
Is this still true if you are upgrading to the SE hydraulic tensioner and oil pump? My local dealer even said the p/n 25464-06 were the correct cams. Are the cams different or has the part number just been changed?
HDF Community Team
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,763
Likes: 2,597
From: san antonio
I am not doubting your research, I found the same thing on eBay. I do know that HD has been known to change part numbers.
Is this still true if you are upgrading to the SE hydraulic tensioner and oil pump? My local dealer even said the p/n 25464-06 were the correct cams. Are the cams different or has the part number just been changed?
Is this still true if you are upgrading to the SE hydraulic tensioner and oil pump? My local dealer even said the p/n 25464-06 were the correct cams. Are the cams different or has the part number just been changed?
Sell to fierofly before he finds a set somewhere and you lose a ready buyer.
Road Master
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 2
From: New Hampshire
DJL is correct the 25149-00 is what you want, you will also need a 17045-99D Cam service gasket kit. While you're in there replace the inner cam bearings.
And the SE 204 is an excellent choice for your 88.
And the SE 204 is an excellent choice for your 88.
Thread Starter
|
Tourer
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 392
Likes: 12
Thanks for the input. Maybe next year I can go to a 95" motor. Right now I want a little more umph on the low end and mid range.
Trending Topics
Road Warrior
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 46
From: Macomb MI
I am looking at Dave mackie TC-510 cams little more aggressive than se204, will work good stock and BB.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Southpaw Super Glide: A Left-Hand-Drive 1979 Harley FXE Built to Fit the Rider
Verdad Gallardo
Road Master
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 2
From: New Hampshire
It's a riding style thing, the TC-510 won't give you as much low and midrage ummph, but it will most likely deliver better peak HP numbers.
Grand HDF Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 189
From: Newcastle, Ca.
https://www.hdforums.com/forum/7763049-post11.html
204's in a 95" is better.
Also, you cant go wrong with a 2n1 for low to mid increase.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
