Ethanol?
If you burn it quickly than you only have to deal with loss of power and mileage. Having to add stuff just to keep the fuel from breaking down and clogging the works up if you might let it set for more than a couple weeks is NOT acceptable. When you factor in the FALSE economy and that MORE energy is actually used to perform the work, much more when you factor in the prodution methods, it makes even less sense.
RAL
My father's boat has run on ethanol gas for years without a hitch, and by your own admission, your truck did not suffer from the same issues as your boat.
Is it possible that you have an older fuel line in place in your boat that was broken down by the ethanol and that is what clogged your fuel filter?
It could also have been a tank of bad gas.....
My father's boat has run on ethanol gas for years without a hitch, and by your own admission, your truck did not suffer from the same issues as your boat.
Is it possible that you have an older fuel line in place in your boat that was broken down by the ethanol and that is what clogged your fuel filter?
It could also have been a tank of bad gas.....
I was not looking for trouble with ethanol, I was not concerned in the least when the switch came. My experiance with the fuel is were my opinion on it use come from. I am not alone...you think all these people with simular experiance are causing their engines to act up with negative vibs?
If we are to use this fuel why is it not stabilized from the start so it can be stored for reasonble time periods. Why are we using corn when others are having better results with other souces? Brazil has been using ethanol for close to 30 years. If you look beyond all the hype you will find that ethanol provides less than 18% of the energy that powers their cars and light trucks.
Ethanol is not a panacea far from it......follow the money.
RAL
Last edited by RAL; Aug 31, 2011 at 10:51 AM.
I was not looking for trouble with ethanol, I was not concerned in the least when the switch came. My experiance with the fuel is were my opinion on it use come from. I am not alone...you think all these people with simular experiance are causing their engines to act up with negative vibs?
If we are to use this fuel why is it not stabilized from the start so it can be stored for reasonble time periods. Why are we using corn when others are having better results with suger cane? Brazil has been using ethanol for close to 30 years. If you look beyond all the hype you will find that ethanol provides less than 18% of the energy that powers their cars and light trucks.
Ethanol is not a panacea far from it......follow the money.
RAL
As for sugar beets, we can't grow them here in the US the way that they can in Brazil, or we would be growing them instead of corn to produce the ethanol we need.
I agree that a large force is behind the ethanol lobby and that its definitely not actually better for the gas, but I disagree with claims that its going to clog or foul modern engines any faster than regular gas. Small engines such as lawnmowers, chainsaws, etc...are the exception due to their rubber parts, but even the new models come with ethanol rated hoses.
As for stabilization, gasoline is really hard to stabilize. Without stabilization, it loses about one octane rating per month stored in fluctuating temps, and even at the longest, stabilized gas is only good for about 3 years TOPS.
Diesel will stabilize for a decade, its a much better choice for long term storage.
I just broke a fuel injected Yamaha out of storage, sitting idle for a YEAR and it fired right up and ran like it was brand new.
I know many people here who have stored vehicles for a long time with tanks full of ethanol gas (stabilized, stored for up to two years) with no clogging issue.
Both my '06 Dyna and '03 Chevy lost about 10% in fuel economy at the exact time the local stations started carrying gas that "contains 10% ethanol." That's not up for debate - it's a fact! And it takes into account gas stations locally (northeast US) and within a 200-400 mile radius.
My 4.3L S10 up until 2009: highway 20-21mpg. After 2009: 18mpg (even w/cruise)
My 88ci Dyna up until 2009: highway 52-53mpg. After 2009: 48mpg
Even www.fueleconomy.gov indicates a "3-4%" reduction in fuel economy using 10% ethanol. And their "results" are meant to encourage and promote the use of 10% ethanol. You can't hide the hit in fuel economy even if you're biased in favor of ethanol. And that is my only gripe with ethanol - I otherwise support running 10% ethanol in my tanks. Just don't try to push it off as something it's not.
Now that I'm reviewing this before posting I'm starting to wonder if the only benefit to 10% ethanol is helping farmers (a worthy benefit IMO). Otherwise - a 10% ethanol blend yields a 10% reduction in fuel economy. Making the ethanol nothing more than filler that takes up space in your tank. So you're still going to buy the fuel you need to drive the miles you travel. But you're going to be refueling 10% more often and paying more for the privilege.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I use enthanol gas in all my bikes, 78 ,91 ,and 03.
also use it in my 200 hp outboard.
you do lose a little power,milage, and it doesn like sitting in the tank a long time.
Just make sure your fuel lines are good(alcohol resistant).
the "corn/fuel" is the biggest scam ever pullled on the american people,
however It is usable ,and if your like me it is all I can get where I live.
This is what you get when we allow lobbist to buy (perks and promised jobs) congressional votes.
Last edited by 1potter1; Sep 2, 2011 at 04:38 AM.
If you have to buy more of it to go the same distance, what is the point?
It is actually costing our economy more and since you have to buy more, probably not saving any foreign or domestic oil either.
We have to pay average of 25 cents more a gallon for "real" gasoline in my area.
Make me buy health insurance that I have not needed in 15 years?
What is next for the commie congress?
Sorry for the Eastwood moment!


