When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Im looking at an 883 sportster, mostly because thats about my max price range and i want a harley after owning several other brands of bike.
My question is what causes the seat/ride height difference between the 883 low and the 883 iron?
And what contributes to the lean angle difference?
The reason i ask is because although i love the look iron, i prefer the wheels and gas tank size of the low.
If i can do it easily i may be able to raise the height of the low to the same as the iron.
Any input gratefully accepted.
Hi from the UK and welcome to HDF.
You're asking that question on the wrong forum! Most members live in the US and will answer you honestly, but you may find the versions of those bikes you get in NZ are different to US specs. They certainly are in the UK. You need to visit the NZ website and a local dealer. If you are lucky, you may find you can still get an 883R, which was discontinued in the US a few years ago, but is still made for some overseas markets like the UK.
You're asking that question on the wrong forum! Most members live in the US and will answer you honestly, but you may find the versions of those bikes you get in NZ are different to US specs. They certainly are in the UK. You need to visit the NZ website and a local dealer. If you are lucky, you may find you can still get an 883R, which was discontinued in the US a few years ago, but is still made for some overseas markets like the UK.
being such a small country there is not much in the way of a forum here and only 3 dealers in the north island that are some distance away, i cant just pop on in and have a chat.
Thanks for the links, i have already compared them.
My question is, where is the height difference between to the two bikes?
i.e is it in the shocks, the wheels, where?
is it simply a longer shock on the iron than the low?
The seat height and ground clearance difference between the two bikes (as per the links above) is only 0.1" (about 2.5mm). That's a pretty insignificant difference. As such, I would doubt that is it due to a difference in shocks. Anyhow, it's close enough between the two to call it even for practical purposes.
Typically you can raise the rear end with longer shocks. Changing the front height isn't that easy. You either need longer fork tubes or a bigger wheel. Could be pretty costly in the end.
being such a small country there is not much in the way of a forum here and only 3 dealers in the north island that are some distance away, i cant just pop on in and have a chat.
There are both models available in the usa.
You can pick up the phone. And check the H-D NZ website to compare specs with the H-D USA website.
That does not mean they are identical to the ones you get! We get different versions of the same bikes here in the UK, as I wrote earlier. They may look the same, but we get taller suspension than the USA on some Sporty models.
Thanks for the links, i have already compared them.
My question is, where is the height difference between to the two bikes?
Originally Posted by got2bjennyg
The seat height and ground clearance difference between the two bikes (as per the links above) is only 0.1" (about 2.5mm). That's a pretty insignificant difference. As such, I would doubt that is it due to a difference in shocks. Anyhow, it's close enough between the two to call it even for practical purposes.
I believe the slight difference in height is in the seat itself. They use different seats.
I believe the slight difference in height is in the seat itself. They use different seats.
The seat height AND the ground clearance for the two bikes (per the specs at the links posted) differ by 0.10". -don't see how the seat affects ground clearance. Even so, that is such a small difference that in real life it won't matter.
Last edited by got2bjennyg; Apr 8, 2012 at 04:03 PM.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.