Got the 48 Back after dyno
The end result was he was able to achieve 71.34 Horsepower off the rear wheel (which he said was excellent for a 1200)? He also explained a lot of other things that he seemed to be very happy about but I really had no real understanding of most of it. Overall, the bike is running cooler and it seems to have more torque than before, it defiantly is quicker, throttle responseis much better and it seems like I do not need to turn the throttle as much to gain the speed I want as before.
He said the only thing he would suggest for a down the road improvement would be to upgrade the cams he said it would allow the bike to run far better in the low and high range, he doesn't feel head work would be necessary or needed.
Anyone care to let me know if the 71.34 on rear wheel is as good as he said??
Thing about dynos, it's a good idea to go back to the same dyno when you make changes. Don't try to chase someone else's dyno numbers, they are irrelevant.
And I'd suggest, unless you really want to drop the $, don't start on the dyno HP chase.
Question, does the PC reset the rev limiter through the ignition? With the SEProST the limiter is set at 7000 which will get more ponies.
Bwana
I have to question those numbers, my neighbor had his dyno'ed and he has got a 2012 Street glide with a 103ci motor he has V&H Duals, a Roland Sands High air flow Breather and the PowerCommander V and his dyno'd at 80.00HP and 102.86 torque. So you want me to believe that your sportster did 79.5Hp with just a stage 1???
Trending Topics
If you have aftermarket pipe & air cleaner then by most dyno's your numbers are low. Should be between 75-80. Made made 75 with the bad performing VH short shots.
What's with the whole stage 1 or 2 or whatever thing. That's just goofy talk, what exactly would a "stage 1" be or "stage 2" or what ever. I hear thus all the time & it really gets annoying. Kind of like back years ago with the 3/4 race cam.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
BTs vs Sportster engines is truely apples vs oranges. The BT is a torque engine, and the Sportster is not. The Sportster is a short stroke with a very small crankshaft. This means less torque and higher rpm. Next, add a tuner, such as the SEPST which I use, that allows higher rev limiter (7000 vs 6200) and you get additional ponies. My 1200 was dynoed twice as a Stage 1 and pulled 79.5 hp and 78.7 hp. I have since done an engine build, see 100 hp,...not quite in the Sportster, and have 98 hp.
Stages, this is not scientific or in the congressional record, but...
Stage 1 - hi flow air cleaner, free flow exhaust and either rejetting the carb or a tuner for FI models
Stage 2 - the above plus a better performing cam
Stage 3 - the above plus better performing (hi comp) pistons
Stage 4 - the above plus "head" work, porting/polishing ect.
hope this helps
Bwana
So what would pipes, air cleaner & free flowing heads be? Would I take Stage 1 add the Stage 4 & divide by 2 to get the average? So like a Stage 2.5?
What about my Vance & Hines Short Shots which are not good powerful pipes, when I upgrade to a stepped 2 into 1 pipe, will I bump up from a Stage 1 to a Stage 2 or am i at Stage 0.5 & with the 2 into 1 I will be at a ful Stage 1? Keep in mind I just put a non-filtered velocity stack on so maybe that increase will go ahead & bump the 2 into 1 up to a full Stage 2?
What "stage" does one increase displacement, "Stage V". What about clutch upgrades or better intake(actual intake, between carb & heads, not intake like A/C)






