Upper Engine Bracket Torque
Thread Starter
|
Advanced
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Upper Engine Bracket Torque
I was checking the torque on a few of the critical fasteners on my 2012 1200 Sportster Custom.
When I came to the Stabilizer link (upper front) engine bracket mounting screws the service manual recommends 55-65 ft-lbs of torque. (These are the bolts that screw into the cylinder head).
This seems like a lot of torque for bolts that are in aluminum. Is this a misprint in the manual or they really are torqued this much? Anyone have a second source of information besides the 2012 service manual?
Thanks
When I came to the Stabilizer link (upper front) engine bracket mounting screws the service manual recommends 55-65 ft-lbs of torque. (These are the bolts that screw into the cylinder head).
This seems like a lot of torque for bolts that are in aluminum. Is this a misprint in the manual or they really are torqued this much? Anyone have a second source of information besides the 2012 service manual?
Thanks
Club Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,320
Likes: 306
From: Boynton Beach, FloriDuh
I was checking the torque on a few of the critical fasteners on my 2012 1200 Sportster Custom.
When I came to the Stabilizer link (upper front) engine bracket mounting screws the service manual recommends 55-65 ft-lbs of torque. (These are the bolts that screw into the cylinder head).
This seems like a lot of torque for bolts that are in aluminum. Is this a misprint in the manual or they really are torqued this much? Anyone have a second source of information besides the 2012 service manual?
Thanks
When I came to the Stabilizer link (upper front) engine bracket mounting screws the service manual recommends 55-65 ft-lbs of torque. (These are the bolts that screw into the cylinder head).
This seems like a lot of torque for bolts that are in aluminum. Is this a misprint in the manual or they really are torqued this much? Anyone have a second source of information besides the 2012 service manual?
Thanks
.
Advanced
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: eureka
Thread engagement is the critical factor if you're worried about stripping threads. Normal rule of thumb is that the bolt/screw should engage with the tapped hole by a length of two and one-half times the bolt/screw diameter.
In other words, if the bolt THREAD diameter (not the hex head or the wrench size) is 3/8 inch then the length of the bolt that is within the tapped hole (NOT the total length of the threaded part of the bolt) should be at least 3/8 x 2.5 or 15/16 inch.
The assumption is that normally this will cause the bolt to shear off rather than strip the threads of the female (tapped) hole. Naturally this is subject to the hardness and tensile strength of the female threads. I'd trust the owner's/shop manual on this one IF you are using the original mounting bolts.
P.S. As always when threading into aluminum, use some form of anti-seize compound -
In other words, if the bolt THREAD diameter (not the hex head or the wrench size) is 3/8 inch then the length of the bolt that is within the tapped hole (NOT the total length of the threaded part of the bolt) should be at least 3/8 x 2.5 or 15/16 inch.
The assumption is that normally this will cause the bolt to shear off rather than strip the threads of the female (tapped) hole. Naturally this is subject to the hardness and tensile strength of the female threads. I'd trust the owner's/shop manual on this one IF you are using the original mounting bolts.
P.S. As always when threading into aluminum, use some form of anti-seize compound -
Last edited by oh_yeah; Jun 24, 2013 at 07:48 PM. Reason: Edited to add P.S.
Ooops, when I did my coil relocation and bolted the bracket in, I used lock tight blue... it was just a few days ago... should I get that out of there or leave it forever?
Trending Topics
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,335
Likes: 27
From: San Diego, CA
My service manual for the 2007 Sportster Custom says the same thing. You would think that if it was a typo it would have been caught a long time before they 2012s came out.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Verdad Gallardo
6 Weirdest Harley-Davidsons Ever Sold to the Public
Verdad Gallardo
7 Times Harley-Davidson Chucked Tradition Out the Window
Verdad Gallardo
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Advanced
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: eureka
Just a personal opinion but if it was me I wouldn't lose any sleep. Loctite, while not anything like anti-seize compound, is likely better than nothing. (I think the danger of seizing a fastener is mostly due to metal-to-metal contact in cast aluminum.)
Club Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,320
Likes: 306
From: Boynton Beach, FloriDuh
+1 - Blue Loctite is the way to go there.