When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So here is the story. I am looking to buy a Nighster, but up here in Alaska options are limited. My two best bets right now are; a 2007 w/5,225 miles, or a 2009 with 8,500 miles. Other than that they are both stock and have good maintenance records.
My question is: Which bike would you recommend based on the info given?
For some reason the two sides of my brain are fighting. One side says "newer bike", but the other argues "less miles bike".
Hopefully you can help me with your experience and input.
Thank you,
-Tony
Last edited by Tallossen; May 28, 2014 at 02:58 AM.
Reason: Better to read
I am also in alaska (anchorage) and I know what you mean by not a lot of selection. My advice is to ride both and see which one rides better. Also are they the same price ? Cause that can be a factor. But based on ur info I always like to buy the newer bike. Good luck on ur purchase.
I think the only real difference between these two years is the ECM location.
That change seems to only make a difference if changing seats or customizing.
There are other minor changes but nothing to the drive train except front axle.
2007 was the first model year, yet very dependable. I recall the only issue was a recall/ TSB on the fuel pump making noise.
I'd agree 3K mileage difference is immaterial, unless you plan to only ride 1000 miles a year.
Do both come with the same maintenance records - no major work/ collisions/ drive belts look good on both?
Paint color make a difference to you?
Tire wear equal?
Alaska...any rust in gas tanks?
Are they the same price?
Alaska, I am stereotyping here...rough roads; may need longer rear shocks...Gas station distances...may need bigger fuel capacity than OEM 3.3 gallons.
Either bike seems OK.
First model year was dependable, higher mileage is an immaterial amount
Only you can decide...condition vs price.
I would go with the cheaper bike. They are the same.
I like the lower miles over longer period better than higher miles over shorter period.
2007 would be my choice. ( given both ride well)
So here is the story. I am looking to buy a Nighster, but up here in Alaska options are limited. My two best bets right now are; a 2007 w/5,225 miles, or a 2009 with 8,500 miles. Other than that they are both stock and have good maintenance records.
My question is: Which bike would you recommend based on the info given?
For some reason the two sides of my brain are fighting. One side says "newer bike", but the other argues "less miles bike".
Hopefully you can help me with your experience and input.
Thank you,
-Tony
Go with the older one. Swap all the fluids and plugs, put on new tires. Check the belt.
You haven't mentioned price. Both sound like good bikes, price being the same go for the one with the best resell value. Like you, I had a choice between 2 clean bikes (at the same price.)
One was a 04, the other a 07, both 883 Customs. Went with the 07 because of higher KBB / NADA resell values.
You haven't mentioned price. Both sound like good bikes, price being the same go for the one with the best resell value. Like you, I had a choice between 2 clean bikes (at the same price.)
One was a 04, the other a 07, both 883 Customs. Went with the 07 because of higher KBB / NADA resell values.
.... resale values? Does that matter on the side if the road?
.... resale values? Does that matter on the side if the road?
Resale values should always be considered, along with the bikes condition.
The OP said both bikes were well maintained, so why should one break down over the other? Sportys are durable machines.
Heaven forbid he has to make a insurance claim, but the best value bike will make it easier for the OP to replace it.
I've been buying bikes since 1979 and have yet to loose money on a used bike.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.