Cams
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,899
Likes: 3,412
From: OH
QtRacer had posted some results from the TTS100 cams in the HO 103 that he seemed to like a lot. I have also heard nothing bad about the cyclerama 575's either.
I know I will take some flack on this one but the HO 103's perform pretty well as is. The cam only bump is not a lot of bang for your buck. A few extra bucks and work the heads with a compression increase and the numbers become more justifiable. Again just my 2 cents.
I know I will take some flack on this one but the HO 103's perform pretty well as is. The cam only bump is not a lot of bang for your buck. A few extra bucks and work the heads with a compression increase and the numbers become more justifiable. Again just my 2 cents.
Your question has too many answers until you are more specific in how and where you ride and what you expect.
Tourer
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Hey Kevin, I have a 12 Road Glide ultra,103, it is a heavy bike so with my wife and all the crap we pack when we travel the improvements you want is what I wanted. So I went with the Andrews 48 cam on the advise of the performance guy at Kutter's, now Boardtracker HD. I added the Dyno sheet so you can see what I ended up with. I am very happy with the outcome, it pulls like crazy, cams start to kick in at about 3000 rpm, I still get 40 - 43 mpg with momma and luggage, when solo about 43-46 mpg.
Road Warrior
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 7
From: Wisconsin
I had the Wood TW-222 cam in the RGC for a while. I would recommend this cam as a drop in for the OPs desired results.
Attached is the dyno chart from when I had the TW-222 cam in my bike.
Attached is the dyno chart from when I had the TW-222 cam in my bike.
Last edited by equandt; Jul 29, 2016 at 12:36 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chgofirefighter
Touring Models
32
Feb 2, 2017 03:05 PM
