When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
They still can't detect a radar or laser that isn't switched on. Besides a laser once it hits you its too late. There is no early warning unless you are getting signal from the laser hitting another car. When that tone goes off you are caught. As for radar some of the traffic cops will wait till the last second and flip the switch. I think having a radar detector is useless and just another piece of clutter but that's just my opinion. Setting cruise at 5 over will save a lot of heartache and money.
A good radar detector will detect an instant on radar gun from a long ways away. You will know he is around long before he sees you. However if the cop is using lidar (laser) and you dont have a laser jammer you are probably gonna be toast. Before I got a radar detector in my cage I usually relied on hiding behind another car when I would see a CHP parked perpendicularly on the side of the road. That is the only way he is going to tag you with a laser. Imagine a sniper shooting through his scope. That is what a cop has to do with laser. If the cop is parked along the side of the road with traffic, he probably has radar Ka band turned on. That is easy to detect from approx. 1/2 mile away.
As far as Jammers being illegal in California, yes they are. But the citation is the equivalent to getting a tinted windows ticket. It is just a fix it ticket. So speeding ticket vs fis it ticket. Ill go with the later.
Before I retired I used instant on radar guns. They recorded and locked in the speed in an instant. Immediately after that I would see the speeder's front end dip down under hard braking.
I felt they were fined twice, first for the cost of the unit then the cost of the fine. Possibly more if they had equipment issues, no seat belt or other matters of concern. I would load up on anyone that was trying to get by evading speed limits with electronic devices. It was poetic justice.
The only value to having a Radar Detector these days is to:
Let you know to look at your speedometer to see if you just got busted. That way you can pull over and wait for the Leo before they have to hit their lights.
To intentionally **** off the Leo when he pulls you over so that you'll get a thorough, no charge, safety inspection of your bike as well as one or more citations for any additional infractions found.
Help you to identify any and all businesses that have automatic doors.
They still can't detect a radar or laser that isn't switched on. Besides a laser once it hits you its too late. There is no early warning unless you are getting signal from the laser hitting another car. When that tone goes off you are caught. As for radar some of the traffic cops will wait till the last second and flip the switch. I think having a radar detector is useless and just another piece of clutter but that's just my opinion. Setting cruise at 5 over will save a lot of heartache and money.
Yep I agree. I think the last one I owned was 20 years ago or so. During those 20 years I averaged about 45K miles a year just for business and like you I found that just setting the cruise at 5 over took out all of the hassle and worry
I have the leftover remnants of the Whistler Crusader on my bike but broke a few years ago. If i could figure out how to remove the 2" round gauge from the dash and replace it with something then that will be the last piece. (think it died a slow death due to moisture getting into the display.)
Other than that, no need for a unit in a Harley around here. Seems that Harley's aren't at the top of the list to pull over for speeding. When i had a CBR600 I was running a V1 and laser blinders, but since then laser jammers are illegal in Texas and newer cars are equipped with blind spot radar, cruise control radar, automatic braking radar; and whatever else that puts off K or Ka signals and drives my V1 nuts.
I once thought about a radar detector and decided against. I admit that I use the posted signs as a suggestion and drive to road conditions and my ability.
constantly aware of my surroundings I slow down before speed traps and nod to the officer going by.
There must be something to this method as so far I have only one ticket and that was when the city lowered the limit while I was at work and forgot to tell me about it in advance.
Not going to play the techno game. If I get pulled over then I was not paying attention and deserve it.
Before I retired I used instant on radar guns. They recorded and locked in the speed in an instant. Immediately after that I would see the speeder's front end dip down under hard braking.
I felt they were fined twice, first for the cost of the unit then the cost of the fine. Possibly more if they had equipment issues, no seat belt or other matters of concern. I would load up on anyone that was trying to get by evading speed limits with electronic devices. It was poetic justice.
So, you were out there being a jerk and getting off on it? The kind of cop who goes out of their way to punish people as much as possible for the pettiest things they can think up, simply for your own personal pleasure? Never mind that some of those people probably couldn't afford the unnecessary "loaded up" fines you amused yourself by giving them (by your own admission) . Never mind that you could have been out there doing something useful with your time, like I dunno, maybe trying to stop crime or help people, versus doing revenue collection. These kind of cops are exactly the kind that give good cops a bad rep. Glad you're retired, stay that way.
And the people using radar to trip detectors and cause people to brake - you might be the biggest idiots of all. Will you still be laughing when someone gets in a serious accident because they weren't expecting the car in front of them to suddenly slam on their brakes? Or how about when they slam on their brakes and careen into the bike next to them? I guess that's funny right? It's okay to put other people's lives and safety at risk because you were entertained.
I hope I never have to share the road with anyone in this thread talking this nonsense, cuz y'all are exactly the type that makes motorcycling dangerous.
Last edited by DaveTheDude; Jun 18, 2019 at 04:32 PM.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.