I'm impressed....should I be? Dyno!!!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 18, 2008 | 07:20 PM

#11

sleepman54

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 2,892

Likes: 2

From: Florida

RE: I'm impressed....should I be? Dyno!!!

Okay now I'm worried about the dyno I had done 2 years ago on my 06 88" FLHT. I got 73 hp with 76 tq, using SE airfilter, stock ECM, PCIII, and wild pig slip-on's.

Feb 18, 2008 | 07:51 PM

#12

izzi

Road Master

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 813

Likes: 1

From: REPUBLIC of TEXAS

RE: I'm impressed....should I be? Dyno!!!

the fuel moto gimmicks getting 78hp and 95tq on an 08 . that torque has got to be a type-o or something. ???

Feb 18, 2008 | 08:04 PM

#13

davewear

Road Warrior

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 1,730

Likes: 199

From: Vancouver BC

RE: I'm impressed....should I be? Dyno!!!

agreed the torque readin must be a typo otherwise he would not believe the shop had done a good job...

Feb 18, 2008 | 08:08 PM

#14

GliderXXX

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 2,282

Likes: 52

From: DFW

RE: I'm impressed....should I be? Dyno!!!

Not to take a swipe at anyone by any means but nothing in the post makes sense to me. 55HP pre tune??? Everything looks out of wack if you ask me. There is no way the stock HP was that low. 88"ers made better HP.

Feb 19, 2008 | 01:26 PM

#15

roxnatwist

Road Captain

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 513

Likes: 2

From: Coconut Creek, FL

RE: I'm impressed....should I be? Dyno!!!

According to my official Dynojet WINPEP7 Performance Evaluation Program fancy-schmancy print out, I was at 68.93 hp and 83.60 tq after the stage 1 efi tuner and before the remap. After the modified map, I was at 73.25 hp and 85.46 tq. Definitely not as much of a gain as I was looking for but obviously better than stock. This was done at HD when I bought the bike. If I should be up around 90, does that mean I need to have it remapped or am I pretty much stuck where I'm at?

Feb 19, 2008 | 01:34 PM

#16

Superglide 04

Tourer

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 479

Likes: 0

From: Somerset, WI

RE: I'm impressed....should I be? Dyno!!!

Doesn't sound right, check my sig on 88". Wish I had a better TQ number, but my TQ curve is flat so that is a plus.

Feb 19, 2008 | 01:40 PM

#17

hoosierhog88

Road Warrior

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,551

Likes: 2

From: Contributor to HDForums.com

RE: I'm impressed....should I be? Dyno!!!

I have an '08 Ultra with RUSH 2" baffles, SE intake and SERT.

My Dyno results are...

Maxpower = 72.61

Max Torque = 86.56

Could his having SE mufflers vs. other, more "open" mufflers be causing his lower results?

I think his Max HP results is a typo.

Ray

Feb 19, 2008 | 02:17 PM

#18

bikergeoff

Road Master

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 1,162

Likes: 1

From: Just South of Detroit, MI

RE: I'm impressed....should I be? Dyno!!!

I think the dyno readings are off. HP seems low before and after, and NO increase in torque? No way you'll get the exact same number on two different dyno runs.