113" tuning all cleaned up!
Thread Starter
|
Road Master
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 783
Likes: 1
From:
RE: 113" tuning all cleaned up!
ORIGINAL: vheflin
Just wondering why the torque and hp curves don't cross at 5252 RPM's as they should? I'm sure someone will chime in with an explanation why this should occur. Good torque numbers.
Just wondering why the torque and hp curves don't cross at 5252 RPM's as they should? I'm sure someone will chime in with an explanation why this should occur. Good torque numbers.
Road Captain
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 521
Likes: 3
From: Virginia
RE: 113" tuning all cleaned up!
After a second look, I think as in most other dyno sheets I've seen if not only is the scaling changed but the torque scale is moved to the left side of the page and the horsepower scale is moved to the right side of the page it will look like it should. You will notice if you were to adjust the scaling as suggested the tq and hp curves would cross at around 3500 RPM's.
ORIGINAL: asuperheat
Thats the scaling he was refering to actualy they cross some where around 5200 and 5400 rpm but the tq scale is diffrent from the hp scale.
ORIGINAL: vheflin
Just wondering why the torque and hp curves don't cross at 5252 RPM's as they should? I'm sure someone will chime in with an explanation why this should occur. Good torque numbers.
Just wondering why the torque and hp curves don't cross at 5252 RPM's as they should? I'm sure someone will chime in with an explanation why this should occur. Good torque numbers.
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,722
Likes: 5
From: Biddeford, Maine
RE: 113" tuning all cleaned up!
ORIGINAL: vheflin
Just wondering why the torque and hp curves don't cross at 5252 RPM's as they should? I'm sure someone will chime in with an explanation why this should occur. Good torque numbers.
Just wondering why the torque and hp curves don't cross at 5252 RPM's as they should? I'm sure someone will chime in with an explanation why this should occur. Good torque numbers.
Steve
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,939
Likes: 3
From: TX
RE: 113" tuning all cleaned up!
That's some awesome torque!
What's that pipe called that makes such great torque? Isn't it BlackCat or something like that?
[8D][8D]
I'd also love to see it plotted with HP & TQ on the same scale. If you can get the run files, I can plot it for ya.
What's that pipe called that makes such great torque? Isn't it BlackCat or something like that?
[8D][8D]
I'd also love to see it plotted with HP & TQ on the same scale. If you can get the run files, I can plot it for ya.
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026
Verdad Gallardo
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,449
Likes: 46
From: Roswell, GA
RE: 113" tuning all cleaned up!
Chris: Thanks for posting; and great power--and I agree on your point about building it once.
Kevin's (pirateeye on HDF) has the same build, (different pipe and a few engine accessories), and nearly identical numbers. What continues to surprise me is how much faster that build is than the HQ 95" he had previously which was a 105+/105+ engine in the hot summer, and 110+/110+ in the fall and winter (different tunes). I have ridden a lot with Kevin and there is just no comparison between the two--the 113 is in a different ballpark acceleration-wise.
Folks doing chart comparisons may look at the hp number and be seriously misled about just how fast Chris' bike is since 110 is seen in 95" builds. And I admit I had no idea what a 130 tq bagger ran like until Kevin's--it's remarkable.
Kevin's (pirateeye on HDF) has the same build, (different pipe and a few engine accessories), and nearly identical numbers. What continues to surprise me is how much faster that build is than the HQ 95" he had previously which was a 105+/105+ engine in the hot summer, and 110+/110+ in the fall and winter (different tunes). I have ridden a lot with Kevin and there is just no comparison between the two--the 113 is in a different ballpark acceleration-wise.
Folks doing chart comparisons may look at the hp number and be seriously misled about just how fast Chris' bike is since 110 is seen in 95" builds. And I admit I had no idea what a 130 tq bagger ran like until Kevin's--it's remarkable.
Tourer
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: CAN
RE: 113" tuning all cleaned up!
asuperheatmine is going to be close to the same. HQ 113", HQ adjustable pushrods and lifters, HQ 575 cams, TP rocker boxes, SE Billet Cam Support plate, Darkhorse doing bottom end work (S&S flywheels and crank with Darkhorses added touch), Primo Rivera Pro Clutch, SE Heavy Breather, SE 50mm TB, SERT with HQ Pro Tuner, Rienhart TD's. Should be SWEET!!! Can't Wait!