HQ 107ST numbers
ok guys, after 2700 miles i finely put the land shark on the dyno after 12-14 pulls we stayed with the first map that was in the bike,
113.5HP/114.7TQthemore i tried to get rid of the lean spot at 2800rpm, the more the numbers dropped, so go ahead, what y'all think ????????
I just remembered reading something that may apply to both of you. If you have a chance, read this thread. There are contributions in it from some very credable folks in the V-Twin performance biz.....
http://groups.msn.com/harleytechtalk...=0&CDir=-2
start with the #70 and work from there, its for the 07/08 103HO, we were surprised at how well it did, i think you will be too, you might lose some TQ numbers because of the larger throttle body,
My lastest tune on my 107 HQ is 106/105 and my A/F looks identical to yours only my torque line is more flat. I'm pinging at cruise speed. Going to Dallas on the 18th to try another tuner.
If so, I may see about dropping by while you are there. What time is your appt?
http://www.woodcarbs.com/daytona21.htm
113/114 ispretty danggood. I know you can really feel a difference and should be happy with the difference. I did the HQ 95" and my numbers aren't that high but the feel is incredible.
Tim,
Don't let my 95" walk you down
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
I would be concerned about that lean spot. It is right at cruising RPMs and will cause extra high temps. IMHO you should find a tuner tofix that issue for you.
A bike with the best dyno sheet may ride like **** if the tune is poor in cruise conditions. The converse is equally true in that the best "riding" bike may not have the most appealing dyno sheet.
There are many components to tuning and all are important. "Proper" tune in normal riding conditions "should" be the most important thing, as we spend the vast majority of our time there. Then there is tune for MAX power (dyno numbers) that occurs under 100% throttle conditions. While it is "nice" to be able to thump your chest and say "My Dynodick is bigger than yours".... for all practical purposes, it's not that big'a deal.
Be sure you understand what is "presented to you" and what it might of might not really mean in terms of usability in real world conditions.
BTW - I don't think I've said it yet, but... nice numbers John, I bet we can still improve on them some...

Also... John knows how to do this stuff as well as anybody, and better than most.


