When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The dealer I bought my SG from installed the 103" street legal kit with SERT before I bought the bike. They told me to ride the bike 500 miles and bring it back for a dyno tune.
This was the first tbw bike anyone at that dealership had ever tried to tune. They did a lousy job on the tune. The bike ran better than stock, but not up to it's potential and I was only getting 30 mpg at best. It also started hard.
I took it back and complained about the starting issue. They put a new starter clutch in and said that should do it. It didn't.
I took the bike to Wabash HD in Terra Haute, In. Scott Hunter told me right away that my starter was fine, I just needed my start up timing changed.
I fully believed that Scott knew what he was doing, so I had him add 10.5:1 domed pistons and performance heads before he tuned it.
I have only ridden the bike 4,000 miles since he tuned it, but all has been very well. More hp, tq and better mileage and easy starting.
Dennis
Hi Dennis,
Do you know if he installed compression releases or not?
Got my 103 done with about 300 mi on it and it does the same as your bike. Cold it starts fine hot it won't hardly turn over. Mine also was tuned with a canned map. I still believe it's in the tuning and when I get it dyno'ed when I get 6-7 hundred miles on it we'll see. I just think the start up timing plus being maybe a little tight is the problem not compression. I'll let you know.
The chart in the Screaming Eagle catalog lists a stock 96 at 9.2:1 comp. Adding a basic 103 kit with SE255 cams and using the flat top pistons 21966-07 provided in the kit bumps comp to 10:1.
I checked my hot, full throttle cranking pressure yesterday and it is about 205 lbs on both cylinders. Does that seem about right? Does anyone know what the stock 96" compression pressure should be?
I can't seem to get a clear idea as to the most efficient means to fix this hard starting problem. Here are the options as I see it:
1.Have electronic compression releases installed which means they have to pull the heads off again. Big bucks.
2.Go for a tuner and dyno tune at about $850 with no guarantee that retarding the timing is going to fix it.
3.Install a heavy duty 1.4 or 1.5 KW starter which is the cheapest fix.
Marc,
Scott installed compression releases on my performance heads, but only because I stepped up to 10.5:1 compression. There is no need for compression releases on a 103" with flat top pistons if it is tuned and timed properly.
Scott tells me that the canned maps will get close, but you have to work with the timing and experiment to get it just right for each bike.
If I had it to do over again, I would've just let Scott tune and time the bike without bumping up the compression. I am happy with my build, but I wish I would've rode it tuned properly before bumping up the compression and adding compression releases.
I am sure I am getting a little more now, but probably didn't gain all that much for the dollars spent. I am used to the compression releases now, but it took a bit to get used to them. My bike starts best now if I open both releases when it is cold, but it starts better hot with just the back one open. That didn't really make sense to me until Scott explained about the fuel being more combustible at the higher temps.
I would like to add one more thing. My tuner doesn't like the automatic compression releases for two reasons. 1. They aren't as reliable as the manuals. They stick open or closed at times. 2. Some bikes start better at different temps with only one open instead of both of them. It doesn't take long trying different things to figure out what is best for your bike.
My best advice for you is to try to find someone who really knows how to time the bike. Your problems should go away then.
Got my 103 done with about 300 mi on it and it does the same as your bike. Cold it starts fine hot it won't hardly turn over. Mine also was tuned with a canned map. I still believe it's in the tuning and when I get it dyno'ed when I get 6-7 hundred miles on it we'll see. I just think the start up timing plus being maybe a little tight is the problem not compression. I'll let you know.
One experiment I was thinking about would be to get it good and hot and then pull the plug caps and see if it turns over. If it does then it would be timing set too far advanced. If it doesn't turn over then its a problem with compression. If its purely compression and not timing causing it to fire back on itself, then a stronger starter should do it. If its timing and its kicking back it will just end up destroying any starter eventually I would think.
I don't have a tuner currently and I really didn't want to put the money in it since the bike runs great except for this problem. If the starter would do it for the long term I'd go for that. What do you think?
I would like to add one more thing. My tuner doesn't like the automatic compression releases for two reasons. 1. They aren't as reliable as the manuals. They stick open or closed at times. 2. Some bikes start better at different temps with only one open instead of both of them. It doesn't take long trying different things to figure out what is best for your bike.
My best advice for you is to try to find someone who really knows how to time the bike. Your problems should go away then.
Dennis
That's very good information. I'll start looking into tuners on Monday. I only spoke with one guy yesterday and he wanted $850 for the tuner and time. That's more than I spent to have the kit installed in the first place Do you think that with the timing backed down and 205 PSI cranking pressure it should start without problems?
I say you are so deep in this already that spending the money for a fuel management system and a proper tune and time is the way to go in the long run. But that's easy for me to say because it's your money..............
Scott also told me that anyone who tunes a bike exactly the way HD teaches will never get it right. He said it takes experience to know what to change, where and when. Not everything is covered in the training manual.
One experiment I was thinking about would be to get it good and hot and then pull the plug caps and see if it turns over. If it does then it would be timing set too far advanced. If it doesn't turn over then its a problem with compression. If its purely compression and not timing causing it to fire back on itself, then a stronger starter should do it. If its timing and its kicking back it will just end up destroying any starter eventually I would think.
I don't have a tuner currently and I really didn't want to put the money in it since the bike runs great except for this problem. If the starter would do it for the long term I'd go for that. What do you think?
Marc
I just don't think you can use a canned map and get everything out of the build. The $850 sounds high, are you talking about the older SERT or the super tuner? I think you can find SERT's on ebay fairly cheap. A dyno should run 60-70 an hr and 2-3 hrs should do it. I have a SERT and I'm just waiting for the break in to tune it. I just don't believe the problem is anything other than timing. I just hope my starter doesn't go before I find out.
I just don't think you can use a canned map and get everything out of the build. The $850 sounds high, are you talking about the older SERT or the super tuner? I think you can find SERT's on ebay fairly cheap. A dyno should run 60-70 an hr and 2-3 hrs should do it. I have a SERT and I'm just waiting for the break in to tune it. I just don't believe the problem is anything other than timing. I just hope my starter doesn't go before I find out.
I tried the plug wires off test today and it in fact cranked right over. That tells me that the problem is most likely timing. I spoke with Laidlaw HD today and the fellow there was confident that they could tune the problem out. He also said that 205 psi was about right for cranking pressure. They have a very good reputation from what I've heard. He quoted me $460 for the tuner (I don't know which one other than it is HD approved) plus $260 for the tune. SoCal labor seems to be running about $95 per hour. That puts me at $720. Better but still expensive. I'll look on eBay and see what's available. Thanks for the tip.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.