super tuner or power comander V
Great post.
Last edited by Zacharia_11; Jun 3, 2009 at 01:52 PM.
You can go with TTS, which is a fine tuner, and incur a $700-800 initial cost (correct me if I'm off here) including a dyno tune, but you'll need another dyno tune if you add mods later. The PCV-AT can auto-tune from a zeroed map if necessary, then continues to tune as you modify the bike. There is no dyno-tune necessary for the vast majority applications, and the cost is only $600. That's the price for a lifetime of tuning based on target AFR's and ignition-advance specs that you specify.
Also, am I not correct in saying that TTS is married to your bike? If it's like SERT/SEST you can't move it from bike to bike or sell it later. PCV can be moved from bike to bike if the connectors and internal configuration is the same. I.e. a PCV for a 2002 will fit a 2007 or anything in between. Where interchangeability gets dicey is with TBW.
Great bunch of info, I would like to point out that many on this forum tune there TTS themselves and are no where close to expert tuners (myself included). TTS will allow for a professional tune, but in no way is it manditory to get one. If you use this info again I paid 430 with serial cables.
Great post.
Like the PCV you can tweak a good base map, like I've done for the past 2˝ years on PCIII's and PCV's--but you must have a good starting point. With PCV-AT you don't even need a good starting point, as a good tune is only a few hours of riding time away. Further, its wide-band sensors allow tuning from about 12.0-16.0:1 AFR, well within the usable range, and throughout the entire RPM/TP scope.
Correct, you can get a two bike licence for about half again the cost of the single licence.
You mention "projections" at WOT, so where do you get these for so many applications and hardware variations? Where do you start? I don't see how you can tune WOT without a very close base map, and you'll need a dyno tune on your bike or one just like it to get that. The PC is a similar scenario, as what values do you plug in as projections? How then do you know if these projections are close without the data obtained from a dyno tune or a good canned map?
If by self-tune you mean the operator tweaks the map, how is this fundamentally different than a basic PCV (non-AT)? I do know they are different approaches, one using the stock ECU exclusively and the other a "piggy-back" module, and that SEST/TTS has VM tables, utilitizes the stock O2 sensors, etc. that the basic PCV doesn't--but how is TTS fundamentally different at self-tuning than a PCV that only costs $300.
Last edited by iclick; Jun 3, 2009 at 02:04 PM.
The stratagy I have seen most often is to leave the bike in closed loop for as much of your map as possible and richen your fuel by using the Closed Loop Bias Tables. Closed Loop, your looking at about 14.2 on the rich side.

What other areas of the bike can the PCV tune?
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
Link to some "light" reading if you would like more detailed information
http://www.mastertune.net/files/Tuni...ning_Guide.pdf
This list is from the PC site:
* Reduced size from PCIIIusb (less than half of the size of PCIII)
* USB powered from computer (9 volt adapter is no longer needed for programming)
* 2 position map switching function built in (map switch not included)
* Gear input (allows for map adjustment based on gear and speed)
* Analog input (allows user to install any 0-5 volt sensor and build an adjustment table based on its input such as boost or temperature)
* With gear position input connected the PCV is capable of allowing each cylinder to be mapped individually and for each gear (for example: on a 4 cylinder bike with a six speed transmission there could be up to 24 separate fuel tables).
* Unit has a -100/+250% fuel change range (up from -100/+100%). This allows more adjustment range for 8 injector sportbikes
* 10 throttle position columns (up from 9 on PCIIIusb)
* Enhanced “accel pump” utility (increased adjustment and sensitivity ranges)


