Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Touring Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #21  
Philly76's Avatar
Philly76
Cruiser
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

+1 on the confusing as hell. Will add +1 in that this seems to be one of the more sensitive discussion points as it really hits home with personal preference. Not to mention, we all think we made the best choices.

I just completed my 103" Stage II kit and went with the SE 255 cam. I appreciated all of the feedback when I threw this out months ago, but will tell you for every plus there was a minus, for every like there was a dislike... think you get it. It is clear, there are a hell of a lot of guys out there that know more about engines than I ever will! I'll tell you, I went with the 255 based on my perception of what was best for my needs and reliability. I also know there might be cams that dyno better and perform better due to this or that.

Being a simple man and not the best around engines, I can say the 103" Stage II w/255 upgrade feels awsome. Just my two cents.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 01:18 PM
  #22  
jeff.georgalas's Avatar
jeff.georgalas
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by bob2002
Andrews 21,great torque curve.
Those aren't "the best" numbers I've seen, but that's one of the nicest, flattest torque curves I've ever seen, and all the way from idle!
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #23  
karter's Avatar
karter
Advanced
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default

Philly , that's is one very nice looking ride !!
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 06:07 PM
  #24  
jag1886's Avatar
jag1886
Grand HDF Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 37
From: Boise Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by ketoman
I have used the search engine, read hundreds of post and most are not answering the question at hand, some are very old and there is new technology out now. Also apparently the 200 9 and 2010 engines have some differences not found in earlier threads..

I worry about Wood's cams on the longevity of their life. Andrews and S&S have been around along time.
There have been at least 50 people ask this same question in the last 3 months and thats as current as you can get.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 06:22 PM
  #25  
Gliden's Avatar
Gliden
Club Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,323
Likes: 37
From: NJ
Default

GUILTY!!!!
BUT.....................hear me out....
I bang in and out of this forum all day all week from work. I don't have time to go read 50 posts.....Not that I havent used the search method for alot of stuff cause I have used it.....but in the age of a fast answer and time is money I opt for an updated quick answer rather than read 50 old posts. Plus I really do like talking to you guys....not reading what someone wrote 3 months to a year ago. But thats just me.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 08:17 PM
  #26  
bob2002's Avatar
bob2002
Road Master
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 999
Likes: 7
From: Allentown,Pa.
Smile

Originally Posted by jeff.georgalas
Those aren't "the best" numbers I've seen, but that's one of the nicest, flattest torque curves I've ever seen, and all the way from idle!
Dave's dyno is a tightwad but it does run really well.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 10:26 PM
  #27  
iclick's Avatar
iclick
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 50
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Ketoman, please describe how you want the bike's performance to be improved? I.e., do you want to emphasize the low-end and midrange, peak-HP (above 5000rpm), or a compromise between the two? Also, do you want a bolt-in cam that you can install in your stock engine with no other mods?
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 10:38 PM
  #28  
BigDaddyMike's Avatar
BigDaddyMike
Club Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,335
Likes: 0
From: Tidewater
Default

READY? SET?HERE WE GO!
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2010 | 10:47 PM
  #29  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Ultimate HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,786
Likes: 40
From: Centralia, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by BigDaddyMike
READY? SET?HERE WE GO!
na, it's all good.

We're starting to see some more 103 builds, and it's good to keep the info fresh. This whole performance thing is a moving target, and yesterdays build is yesterday's news.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 05:12 AM
  #30  
ketoman's Avatar
ketoman
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Western Maine
Default

iclick

I am looking to stay as close to stock as possible (as the bike is still new, when she starts getting tired that's a different story), low to mid range, living and riding the mountains of Maine and New Hampshire on my daily commute, I want reliability and more power than is offered in my factory machine.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.