Andrews 48H
All that said, I do think the Andrew 48 is a winner for baggers. If I bought a new 103 I would probably opt for it over the 255, but not without giving it considerable thought, as I like the 255's very much in the TC96. For the smaller motor I would prefer the 255's because I think they'll bump the low-end better, which is a priority for me over top-end performance, and with 9.2:1 compression we need all the help we can get. OTOH the 103 has higher compression (9.7:1), and retaining good low-end grunt wouldn't be as much of a worry as with the 96.
What kind of temperatures are you seeing with your setup?
Last edited by iclick; Jul 13, 2011 at 10:44 AM.
All that said, I do think the Andrew 48 is a winner for baggers. If I bought a new 103 I would probably opt for it over the 255, but not without giving it considerable thought, as I like the 255's very much in the TC96. For the smaller motor I would prefer the 255's because I think they'll bump the low-end better, which is a priority for me over top-end performance, and with 9.2:1 compression we need all the help we can get. OTOH the 103 has higher compression (9.7:1), and retaining good low-end grunt wouldn't be as much of a worry as with the 96.
What kind of temperatures are you seeing with your setup?








