When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
And that my friends is the best statement yet. Nobody has the resources/time/money to r&d camshafts like the factory. You want more power, sure there are better alternatives.
But you will be giving up longevity, and quietness.
Hell if I wanted to go fast on 2 wheels, I wouldn't be riding a Harley...........LOL
No need to comment on the OP question, as it has been answered very well
Actually,Andrews does quite a bit of real world testing before they release a cam........................
Actually,Andrews does quite a bit of real world testing before they release a cam........................
All reputable cam manufacturers do real world testing before releasing a new product, but your kidding yourself if you think anyone does more/better/through testing than an OEM.
Its just economics's (think warranty work) plus they have deeper pockets
All reputable cam manufacturers do real world testing before releasing a new product, but your kidding yourself if you think anyone does more/better/through testing than an OEM.
Its just economics's (think warranty work) plus they have deeper pockets
So an OEM that has to be responsible for the design of the entire motorcycle, ( on a Corporate dictated budget no less,) is going to spend more time on the camshafts than a Company whose sole purpose in life is to design, test and manufacture just cams?
I don't think so.
For example on a personal note, I have problems with my left eye. And my Retinal Specialist is way more educated, ( because he's specialized,) in retinal issues that my General Opthamologist, even though both are full MD's. One concentrates on just one component, the other doesn't have the time or resources, because he worries about the whole eyeball.
So an OEM that has to be responsible for the design of the entire motorcycle, ( on a Corporate dictated budget no less,) is going to spend more time on the camshafts than a Company whose sole purpose in life is to design, test and manufacture just cams?
I don't think so.
For example on a personal note, I have problems with my left eye. And my Retinal Specialist is way more educated, ( because he's specialized,) in retinal issues that my General Opthamologist, even though both are full MD's. One concentrates on just one component, the other doesn't have the time or resources, because he worries about the whole eyeball.
Sorry to hear about your eye problems.
But we are comparing two different things. Aftermarket performance manufacturers (pick any part you like) just don't have the resources to test like the factory does.
Back in the late 80's I worked for Exxon in their test facilities in Linden NJ. They would run cars on chassis dynos 24/7 for months at a time to check their oil additives for excessive wear in motors and their fuel additives for carbon build up. The Big 3 had a presence on-site, in addition to their own in-house testing.
What Iam trying to say is aftermarket manufacturers can only dream of the resources the OEM manufacturers have
For my ride style, the TW 222 get up on torque Sooner and the torque curve is taller ft/# then the SE, the TW cam torque carries further with better numbers and makes more hp over the range of the curve.
All in all, I feel that the TW222 offers a better performance curve for a bagger and I felt it right away after the cam swap on my bike.
Run what you want, but if someone snuck a TW 222 in on your bike I bet that your grin factor would be significant and you would not want the 255 cam back.
Why use a 6 shooter when you can have 1 in the chamber and 14 in the clip?
Cheers,
Mark
Check out Woods cam page and dyno sheets for the TW 222 or Fuelmoto
The 255 is just a damn good cam...that when a guy says another cam is even better, guys are going to ask how? It's not an insult, but just a curious response.
I, for one, appreciate your response, and will look into this.
My SE255 are so damn good.....if one is even better, then sharing it with us is a damn good thing to do, on your part....so I thank you.
The guy buying a new scooter needs to know what to go with. I recommend a SE255....if there are options that will also get them where they need to go, then all is good, IMHO.
I just want guys to be as happy as I am with my bagger
For my ride style, the TW 222 get up on torque Sooner and the torque curve is taller ft/# then the SE, the TW cam torque carries further with better numbers and makes more hp over the range of the curve.
Thanks, that is way more helpful than "The TW 222 cam, that's the cam that you need in place of the SE 255."
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.