Why use pushrods?
As much as I like the OHC's in my rice bikes, I'd never want a HD engine with them, unless it was the VRod engine, or a variant of the VRod engine. Long chains and dual heads is a disaster. I don't think there is enough room to get cam chain tensioners in there that would work. VCT would be a nice benefit of OHC, but again it is a space issue.
Which once again brings me to why HD is going to die a slow death, failure to come into the 20th century and put a water cooled engine in a bagger frame.
I'd be first in line to pay MSRP plus for a bagger with a Vrod engine with low to mid range cam grinds
Last edited by Neggy ZRXOA 5248; Apr 29, 2012 at 10:01 PM.
Last edited by Retrop; Apr 29, 2012 at 10:23 PM.
If you start new like Victory you go with any technology there is.
Push rods on two valve lower rpm big valves which puts out more power at lower rpms.
Dual cams with four valves per cylinder have small valves which are a fraction of the weight of a single big valve. Therefore a much lighter valve spring can be used and the rpm can be much higher without the wear on the cam and drag that a heavy spring would have.
Flow in the four valve is not as good and does not produce the power at the same rpm a two valve runs at. The power from the four valve system comes from the higher rpm range that they can operate at without floating. This also has less parasitic drain on power than a two valve system.
One is not better than the other. It depends on what you want to do. High low end grunt use a two valve. High speed use a four valve.
There is a lot of life left in the push rod V twin yet. So just appreciate what it does.
Want a four valve water cooled HD just get a Vrod. Too many seem to forget about it. And by the way it was Willie G's baby which many seem to have forgotten also. He is very pleased with the radiator cowling design that he is responsible for. He is staying around as a consultant for some time to come. Of course he is a major stock holder also. So wild swings in product are not in the cards. He has been working for years to have water cooled Harley's in the 70's to early 80's. I guess no one heard of the Nova project. When he and other HD people bought AMF out, they had to decide to bring the Nova to market or improve the existing line. They didn't have money for both and improving an existing platform cost way less to do. So we got the EVO motor and more outsource parts. And that is the rest of the story for those ill informed but opinionated posters.
What has held back HD. The HD OWNER. They cry about water cooling and radiators, they won't accept the Vrod as a Harley. Until the current majority of HD owners are 6 feet under HD has to listen to them. That is the job HD does well. Listen to the owners and give them what they say they want. So don't blame HD they are trying to keep in business buy giving their customers what they want. What a crazy ridiculous Idea.
Last edited by lh4x4; Apr 29, 2012 at 11:38 PM.
If you start new like Victory you go with any technology there is.
Push rods on two valve lower rpm big valves which puts out more power at lower rpms.
Dual cams with four valves per cylinder have small valves which are a fraction of the weight of a single big valve. Therefore a much lighter valve spring can be used and the rpm can be much higher without the wear on the cam and drag that a heavy spring would have.
Flow in the four valve is not as good and does not produce the power at the same rpm a two valve runs at. The power from the four valve system comes from the higher rpm range that they can operate at without floating. This also has less parasitic drain on power than a two valve system.
One is not better than the other. It depends on what you want to do. High low end grunt use a two valve. High speed use a four valve.
There is a lot of life left in the push rod V twin yet. So just appreciate what it does.
Want a four valve water cooled HD just get a Vrod. Too many seem to forget about it. And by the way it was Willie G's baby which many seem to have forgotten also. He is very pleased with the radiator cowling design that he is responsible for. He is staying around as a consultant for some time to come. Of course he is a major stock holder also. So wild swings in product are not in the cards. He has been working for years to have water cooled Harley's in the 70's to early 80's. I guess no one heard of the Nova project. When he and other HD people bought AMF out, they had to decide to bring the Nova to market or improve the existing line. They didn't have money for both and improving an existing platform cost way less to do. So we got the EVO motor and more outsource parts. And that is the rest of the story for those ill informed but opinionated posters.
What has held back HD. The HD OWNER. They cry about water cooling and radiators, they won't accept the Vrod as a Harley. Until the current majority of HD owners are 6 feet under HD has to listen to them. That is the job HD does well. Listen to the owners and give them what they say they want. So don't blame HD they are trying to keep in business buy giving their customers what they want. What a crazy ridiculous Idea.
More than enough grunt with the five speed.
In the near term HD will most likely offer water cooled heads with the radiator under the seat like the Nova bike.
That's nuts. Willie new exactly how to keep the company in business ... design the engines to be a lot more reliable, but keep the old school push rod design. That's the beauty of these bikes. If they changed that, why the F' would we keep buying them. We could just go out and buy any generic piece of ****.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
More than enough grunt with the five speed.
In the near term HD will most likely offer water cooled heads with the radiator under the seat like the Nova bike.
http://thekneeslider.com/archives/20...-heads-patent/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiW4t-03_2Y
I'll be one of those guys who will own the push rod version until I'm no longer here. No apologies!







