Cam Choice
I ran the 255's for about 4 years and 30,000 miles in all kinds of weather, temps, elevation, city, highway, etc. I paid close attention to the fuel mileage after every fill up and also watched the oil temp. So I believe I have a good handle on it.
I have an oil temp gauge (HD set with probe in front side of oil pan) in the fairing (which i had with the 255's as well as Feulings) as well as a digital one in the oil dipstick hole and compare them both. So I can say for certainty that the engine does run cooler, I get better gas mileage, and better torque.
As far as gas mileage, for some reason where I live I get crappy gas mileage, but the Feulings have increased it from 33-35 mpg avg to around 40mpg in the same kind of driving conditions and same fuel stop.
Running in 6th gear around 70 mph is about 2500-2600 rpms. With the 255's, while not exactly lugging, it just did not feel like it had any get up and go, i always had to downshift to get up and go, if I was going up a big hill, etc.
The torque curve is not flat on the 255's all the way to redline, at least not on mine per the dyno sheet. It is with the Feulings though. I have a ThunderMax on it it is always adjusting to the correct AFR ratio.
Every bike is a little different, every rider style is different, etc. I am just relaying my own personal experiences with the 255's vs the Feulings.
Last edited by iclick; Jul 8, 2012 at 05:32 PM.
I really appreciate all your input guys. I've for sure learned a thing or too. In my car hot rod days, I've over cammed more than once, causing me to chase other parts to compensate.
Right now, I'm leaning a little toward the SE-204's. For one thing, I spend most of my time in the 2,000-3,200 RPM range and hardly ever hit higher than 4,000 RPM's but when I hit the throttle, I want the bike to be trying to pull me off of it. My thoughts are (since I don't have actual data to compare to), better safe than sorry. I think the 204's performance will be ending very soon after my normal high RPM's while the 255's performance will be coming in just before my cruising range. I'm probably safe either way but feel better erring on the bottom end torque side.
Is there a better way to make this decision?
Right now, I'm leaning a little toward the SE-204's. For one thing, I spend most of my time in the 2,000-3,200 RPM range and hardly ever hit higher than 4,000 RPM's but when I hit the throttle, I want the bike to be trying to pull me off of it. My thoughts are (since I don't have actual data to compare to), better safe than sorry. I think the 204's performance will be ending very soon after my normal high RPM's while the 255's performance will be coming in just before my cruising range. I'm probably safe either way but feel better erring on the bottom end torque side.
Is there a better way to make this decision?
Last edited by vickers1; Jul 8, 2012 at 09:56 PM.
I like the orange color.
Last edited by mgmmgm; Jul 9, 2012 at 10:25 AM.
I really appreciate all your input guys. I've for sure learned a thing or too. In my car hot rod days, I've over cammed more than once, causing me to chase other parts to compensate.
Right now, I'm leaning a little toward the SE-204's. For one thing, I spend most of my time in the 2,000-3,200 RPM range and hardly ever hit higher than 4,000 RPM's but when I hit the throttle, I want the bike to be trying to pull me off of it. My thoughts are (since I don't have actual data to compare to), better safe than sorry. I think the 204's performance will be ending very soon after my normal high RPM's while the 255's performance will be coming in just before my cruising range. I'm probably safe either way but feel better erring on the bottom end torque side.
Is there a better way to make this decision?
Right now, I'm leaning a little toward the SE-204's. For one thing, I spend most of my time in the 2,000-3,200 RPM range and hardly ever hit higher than 4,000 RPM's but when I hit the throttle, I want the bike to be trying to pull me off of it. My thoughts are (since I don't have actual data to compare to), better safe than sorry. I think the 204's performance will be ending very soon after my normal high RPM's while the 255's performance will be coming in just before my cruising range. I'm probably safe either way but feel better erring on the bottom end torque side.
Is there a better way to make this decision?
SE204 - midrange with peak HP around 5800 revs
SE255 - ultimate low end, great for heavy bikes or for the person who routinely shifts below 4500 revs. Peak power is still made over 5000
Do you want to reconsider?
"Running out of steam" is something I hear every time the 255's are brought up in cam thread discussions, but usually it is uttered by someone who's never actually owned or even ridden a bike with them installed. You are the exception and I respect your opinion, but this isn't a sensation that I get at all. A properly tuned engine with stock compression and 255 cams installed will provide a very flat torque curve all the way to the redline.
And run to redline? No way........
Now come on, that cant be right......they fall right off after 4k??......lol Just like mine.....if you NEVER rev it up then dont worry about it, but if you do, run! run away and get something else.....






