Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam Choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2012 | 05:28 PM
  #21  
iclick's Avatar
iclick
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 50
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by mr396
I have a 103ci engine and that will make a difference in fuel mileage, rpm's, lugging, engine temp.
Well, if anything I would think the 103 might have an easier time running at 2000rpm in 6th gear, and mileage probably wouldn't be that much worse given a good tune. The 103 has a bit more displacement but it also has more compression, and the latter will help mileage.

I ran the 255's for about 4 years and 30,000 miles in all kinds of weather, temps, elevation, city, highway, etc. I paid close attention to the fuel mileage after every fill up and also watched the oil temp. So I believe I have a good handle on it.
The tune is important as well as riding style, and it probably wasn't too reasonable of me to compare my mileage with yours considering there are quite a few variables involved. I just think ~35mpg is lower than most achieve. A local friend with the 103/255 combo was getting in that range until I did some tweaking to his PCV map, and his mileage is now well into the 40's.

I have an oil temp gauge (HD set with probe in front side of oil pan) in the fairing (which i had with the 255's as well as Feulings) as well as a digital one in the oil dipstick hole and compare them both. So I can say for certainty that the engine does run cooler, I get better gas mileage, and better torque.
I don't doubt that it does run cooler, but I'm just surprised at the level of difference. I don't have much to compare mine to except the stock setup, and it is about the same. It's also true that the 103 will run hotter than a 96 for a variety of reasons, and the bigger engine indeed has a reputation for that.

As far as gas mileage, for some reason where I live I get crappy gas mileage, but the Feulings have increased it from 33-35 mpg avg to around 40mpg in the same kind of driving conditions and same fuel stop.
I presume you also have a different tune which may run a bit more efficient in the cruise range. I just can't think of a reason why 255's would achieve lower mileage than anything else given a good tune, and my experience with them has been good in this respect.

Running in 6th gear around 70 mph is about 2500-2600 rpms. With the 255's, while not exactly lugging, it just did not feel like it had any get up and go, i always had to downshift to get up and go, if I was going up a big hill, etc.
Well, that really doesn't sound like 255s at all. If anything, the feel in 6th gear is one of the first things people usually cite as a big improvement. I find that I can go all the way down to 55mph in 6th, which is about 2100 rpm, although I normally don't go below 60mph.

The torque curve is not flat on the 255's all the way to redline, at least not on mine per the dyno sheet. It is with the Feulings though. I have a ThunderMax on it it is always adjusting to the correct AFR ratio.
Could you post both charts? It would be interesting to take a look at them.

Every bike is a little different, every rider style is different, etc. I am just relaying my own personal experiences with the 255's vs the Feulings.
You're right and you did a good job of clarifying your points. Thanks for the input. With some of your complaints I can't help wondering if you might have had a tuning issue or crankcase sumping with your first build. Sumping will increase heat as well as stifle performance and mileage. There are some checks you can make for that, but it's obviously too late for that now. Installing the cams one tooth off their correct positions will cause problems too, and this happens more often than you might think, even with experienced builders.
 

Last edited by iclick; Jul 8, 2012 at 05:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2012 | 09:47 PM
  #22  
vickers1's Avatar
vickers1
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 20
From: Southeast GA
Default

I really appreciate all your input guys. I've for sure learned a thing or too. In my car hot rod days, I've over cammed more than once, causing me to chase other parts to compensate.

Right now, I'm leaning a little toward the SE-204's. For one thing, I spend most of my time in the 2,000-3,200 RPM range and hardly ever hit higher than 4,000 RPM's but when I hit the throttle, I want the bike to be trying to pull me off of it. My thoughts are (since I don't have actual data to compare to), better safe than sorry. I think the 204's performance will be ending very soon after my normal high RPM's while the 255's performance will be coming in just before my cruising range. I'm probably safe either way but feel better erring on the bottom end torque side.

Is there a better way to make this decision?
 

Last edited by vickers1; Jul 8, 2012 at 09:56 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 12:24 AM
  #23  
07FLHT's Avatar
07FLHT
Stellar HDF Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 9
From: Sunny Southern California
Default

Your turn "boogaloodude" LOL!
(I love 255 cam threads! LOL!)
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 09:21 AM
  #24  
mikebaby's Avatar
mikebaby
Road Master
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 3
From: Central Ohio
Default

255's will pull strong to 4500.

mikebaby
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 10:12 AM
  #25  
mgmmgm's Avatar
mgmmgm
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 6
From: Spokane, WA.
Default

Originally Posted by C.H.L.
I just had a HD dealer put in the 255s last week,and I LOVE them! Out the door, the dealer did it for $999.95. It is a special that Indepedence HD in College Station, TX runs.
I like the orange color.
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 10:20 AM
  #26  
mgmmgm's Avatar
mgmmgm
Outstanding HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 6
From: Spokane, WA.
Default

http://i988.photobucket.com/albums/a...21120001-1.jpg

my dyno run with 255 cams
 

Last edited by mgmmgm; Jul 9, 2012 at 10:25 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 10:37 AM
  #27  
Deer Stalker's Avatar
Deer Stalker
Road Master
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 846
Likes: 13
From: Out there!
Default

Originally Posted by vickers1
I really appreciate all your input guys. I've for sure learned a thing or too. In my car hot rod days, I've over cammed more than once, causing me to chase other parts to compensate.

Right now, I'm leaning a little toward the SE-204's. For one thing, I spend most of my time in the 2,000-3,200 RPM range and hardly ever hit higher than 4,000 RPM's but when I hit the throttle, I want the bike to be trying to pull me off of it. My thoughts are (since I don't have actual data to compare to), better safe than sorry. I think the 204's performance will be ending very soon after my normal high RPM's while the 255's performance will be coming in just before my cruising range. I'm probably safe either way but feel better erring on the bottom end torque side.

Is there a better way to make this decision?
Now you've confused me, let me highlight what you've said and what HD say:

SE204 - midrange with peak HP around 5800 revs

SE255 - ultimate low end, great for heavy bikes or for the person who routinely shifts below 4500 revs. Peak power is still made over 5000

Do you want to reconsider?
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 11:02 AM
  #28  
vickers1's Avatar
vickers1
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 20
From: Southeast GA
Default

I'm always ready to reconsider. If I have it backwards, I need to straighten that out so that I don't make a big and costly mistake. Is that the way it is?
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 11:11 AM
  #29  
Coolhawg6622's Avatar
Coolhawg6622
Road Master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 900
Likes: 4
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by iclick
"Running out of steam" is something I hear every time the 255's are brought up in cam thread discussions, but usually it is uttered by someone who's never actually owned or even ridden a bike with them installed. You are the exception and I respect your opinion, but this isn't a sensation that I get at all. A properly tuned engine with stock compression and 255 cams installed will provide a very flat torque curve all the way to the redline.
You can debate all you want.....They flat out run out of steam after about 4200 rpm...done gone they are done working! I have had them in a 96 and now in a 103 and I hate em! As soon as they can be gone, they will. Much better choices out there unless you drive under said rpm levels. I would try 204's before wasting $$ on 255's.
And run to redline? No way........
 
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2012 | 11:15 AM
  #30  
Coolhawg6622's Avatar
Coolhawg6622
Road Master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 900
Likes: 4
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by mgmmgm

Now come on, that cant be right......they fall right off after 4k??......lol Just like mine.....if you NEVER rev it up then dont worry about it, but if you do, run! run away and get something else.....
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.