When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Looks to me like the chart "error" is on the scaling. Tq is on a 0-90ish scale, HP is on a 0-70. I bet they'd match up at 5252 if they were scaled the same. HP does look low though. My stage 1 88 makes less torque but more hp than yours. Your power seems to be falling off early like she needs more air...
that makes sense the chart should intersect where the numbers say, definite error. I am going to the Burst collection air cleaner now. I was expecting a little more hp. It is a totally different bike than stock
Not that bad for a Stage I with true duals, a crappy air filter, EPA cams and an auto tune. Strap on a Dragula 2:1 or V&H Propipe, SE air filter and get the engine tuned on a dyno; she will wake up. Of course, a set of Andrews 48 cams will make a huge difference, even if you keep the TDs.
that makes sense the chart should intersect where the numbers say, definite error. I am going to the Burst collection air cleaner now. I was expecting a little more hp. It is a totally different bike than stock
thanks guys
There is no error. The hp and torque scales are different on the graph. The curves reflect the chart on the right. You can see how the stock cams fall off quickly. That makes for a lower HP number. Like already said, A good cam will help hold more torque in the higher RPM range and thus increase the HP number.