Heavy in the handlbars?
Does 600.00 including everything sound reasonable??
2012 RK Classic.
not a big deal but something to think of.
the suspension travel will also be reduced so more dampening has to happen in less space and time, make sure you get a progressive wound spring set
before you lower the front ( because it is costly if done at a shop..or $120 if DIY)... have a look and see if anything is hanging down that would hit more easily.
IF you have V&H power duals, the cover on the X pipe is more likely to hit hard on rt turns ( hard enough to relieve traction from the rear)- and the crossover clamp needs to be oriented so that the excess threads can't grab a speed bump and pull the exhaust off.
you also need to check that the fender can't hit any oil cooler etc
Mike
Last edited by mkguitar; Jan 17, 2013 at 03:38 PM.
So...your saying it might actually degrade the feel at highway speeds? I thought by bringing it back to factory rake it would handle better?
Thanks!!
less rake and a shorter wheelbase will be more 'twitchy'- that is why sportbikes have short wheel bases ( and big guys like me never bought a Buell).
for your application, the difference will be slight, but it'll be there.
so this concern is almost more academic than practical, but for $600...if you want to change back it's another 4 hours labour.
the touring series are engineered to be pretty stable at low speeds out of the box- that is why the front end is unique in the motorcycle world.
but a taller bike will always out handle a lowered bike, regardless of the speed.
BTW I own some bikes that are lowered...some that are not. and my touring bike uses the 12" SG shocks in town, and I put the 13" back on when I tour
mike
Maybe I was just imagining.
Trending Topics
Last edited by 96inchBOB; Jan 18, 2013 at 11:37 AM.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
You will often see "lean angle" in the specifications list. A bike which can lean to 33ş will corner better than a bike which will lean to 25ş
it may surprise you that for 2013 a 883 has lean angle of 29şR/30şL while a FLHTC is 33şR/31şL.
A FLHX is 32şL/29şR due to the lowered rear
A sporty SuperLow is less than 25ş R/L
I have been told that the Sporty chassis took a real handling step backwards when they went to rubbermount.
Look at a Buell for a good example of what a bike could be... 2007 XB12STT
Lean Angle:
Soft Contact, Right 44° ( soft contact being pegs are stuff that move out of the way)
Soft Contact, Left 44°
Hard Contact, Right 53° ( hard contact being hard parts that will relieve traction from the tires)
Hard Contact, Left 46°
Mike
Last edited by mkguitar; Jan 18, 2013 at 10:45 AM.
Air pressure is at reccomended level. I noticed it as soon as I had the rear shocks lowerd.
Thanks though.






