When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Dude I could roll on after I got rid of the true duals. I stand by my position as does the poster above me. And let me tell with the 103, 255 cams, and some head work I now roll on at 60MPH with no problem. You can run it through your head any way you want but you can't show me a dyno sheet and you can't show me anyone that on the road has tested them beck to back and says yup the true duals perform better. They don't. They cost you torque. And like I said I don't want to get into it but in addition to the shops telling me they were the problem I did a lot of research that proves it. I suggest you do the same.
Technically speaking, there is power loss in lower RPMs with true dual over 2 into 1 setups. However, issues like you're describing, no way that was simply true duals. The power loss is negligable, millions of bikes are running around just fine with true duals, they're one of the most poular mods done to these bikes. Slight power loss that most folks that want the true dual look and sound wouldn't notice or care about? sure. Making the bike basically unusable at highway speed? Nope.
I disagree. It was definitely noticeable on my bike and I had two shops tell me so. I really hated admitting I wasted 900.00 on true duals or whatever it was and set out to research the topic. Anybody with really advanced knowledge on the topic came back with pretty much the same response, you are ruining the scavenging in the engine and don't fall for marketing hype. I put the factory head pipe back on, took it to dealer and had them install a proper map. It was the end of my roll on problems.
I disagree. It was definitely noticeable on my bike and I had two shops tell me so. I really hated admitting I wasted 900.00 on true duals or whatever it was and set out to research the topic. Anybody with really advanced knowledge on the topic came beck with pretty much the same response, you are ruining the scavenging in the engine and don't fall for marketing hype. I put the factory head pipe back on, took it to dealer and had them install a proper map. It was the end of my roll on problems.
A loss of power is one thing but sputtering shouldn't happen just from exhaust. They probably had a bad map on in the first place. I know a dyno tune is expensive but I guarantee if they did one it wouldn't of had that issue. A loss of low end would of existed but nothing like that.
It seems like a lot of 'tuners' these days go off of pre-made maps from existing tunes. It's a cheap alternative but a good dyno tune will get the bike running perfectly (with good gas mileage) at cruise and also get the most power at WOT.
A loss of power is one thing but sputtering shouldn't happen just from exhaust. They probably had a bad map on in the first place. I know a dyno tune is expensive but I guarantee if they did one it wouldn't of had that issue. A loss of low end would of existed but nothing like that.
It seems like a lot of 'tuners' these days go off of pre-made maps from existing tunes. It's a cheap alternative but a good dyno tune will get the bike running perfectly (with good gas mileage) at cruise and also get the most power at WOT.
Who said sputtering? I sure didn't. I said it bogged down and started pinging. I didn't say a thing about sputtering. You are putting words in my mouth. The factory 07s barely had enough torque to pull 6th gear at 70MPH and they already ran very hot. Change something that decreases torque and sixth gear became unusable. I did have the bike on the dyno with the true duals and a tune but I have never had the bike on a dyno with the factory head pipes. The numbers were pretty dismal with the true duals on the bike. And that was with both a stage one map in the factory ECM and a tuned Thunder Max (Thunder Max was supposed to take care of the tune and get my torque back, it didn't). And, like I said it is a long complicated story that I don't want to get into in this thread.
Who said sputtering? I sure didn't. I said it bogged down and started pinging. I didn't say a thing about sputtering. You are putting words in my mouth. The factory 07s barely had enough torque to pull 6th gear at 70MPH and they already ran very hot. Change something that decreases torque and sixth gear became unusable. I did have the bike on the dyno with the true duals and a tune but I have never had the bike on a dyno with the factory head pipes. The numbers were pretty dismal with the true duals on the bike. And that was with both a stage one map in the factory ECM and a tuned Thunder Max (Thunder Max was supposed to take care of the tune and get my torque back, it didn't). And, like I said it is a long complicated story that I don't want to get into in this thread.
You're right I misread. But regardless bogging down and pinging wont come from just exhaust. A noticeable loss of low end compared to a 2-1 (but a better low end than stock) would be there but with a good tune it should be almost completely eliminated. Not 100% gone but instead of a dip it will be a flat line.
You said you had the bike on the dyno with the true duals and a tune meaning they threw a basic tune on the bike and you saw what numbers you where running correct? Not a full dyno tune which would of shown the low end loss and probably bad tune and corrected it as they tuned it further.
My 96 with drag pipes and intake would pull in 6th at 55mph on up. It certainly wasn't fast but it wasn't bogging down either. Putting a canned tune on a bike and letting the tuner figure it out sometimes works but it has to be pretty close from the start. I still 100% disagree it was the exhaust that caused you all your trouble when there are so many others who ran the same setup (myself included) and had no issues.
I don't mean to poke and prod you about it but the thread is about true duals and why people use them. I'm sure there's enough general knowledge out there and actual tuners who read this who could provide their input based on your experience and full story.
I think that for the most part, a 2-1, equal length tube exhaust is going to give the best performance. Second to that would be a crossover 2-1-2. But 2-1 and crossovers are not solely responsible for scavenging exhaust gasses. That’s not to say they won’t improve flow velocity, just isn’t the primary element that makes up a good exhaust system with good velocity. That’s why not all true duals are created equal.
I can certainly understand if the bike is geared tall to begin with and you add an exhaust system that has less velocity at low revs than what you replaced it with, then you are possibly going to see a difference in low end grunt. Especially if you are one that is sensitive to the performance level of your bike. Some people get on and just ride and are not all that “in tune” with the way the bike is performing…. While others are paying attention to every single rev.
I have a 2012 103. I am running V&H true duals and their twin slash rounds. I have a S/E heavy breather and a PV tuner. I love the looks and the sound of the true duals and wanted to make them work. I went with the Big City Thunder head pipe monster baffles that help increase the flow velocity and increase low to mid range torque. I was skeptical when I purchased them but the results were outstanding. The volumetric efficiency is far better with this setup over stock. The low to mid range pull is way more than it ever was with the stock exhaust. Could it be better with a 2-1 or a 2-1-2 ? Possibly but I’m not sure I would notice the difference all that much in the seat.
The BCT head pipe baffles also made it sound way better. It took some of the raspy obnoxious sound out and made it a much deeper frequency. I am very pleased with this setup. I can be doing 60 in 6th gear riding 2 up and roll on the throttle a little and feel it pull strong without lugging.
OK so what I've learned here is basically what I already knew coming from the Dyna forum. If you want to make more power get a 2 into 1 if you want the look of dual exhaust without loosing power you need a cross over.The guy that did the Dyno on my Bob was a fan of true duals he claimed he could get better power out of them because it made it easier to tune each individual cylinder. He could put his exhaust Gas Analyzer in each pipe but...he was blown away by how much power my otherwise stock TC88 was making with just the Thunderheader SERT,and a SE air cleaner.I'm sure True Duals can be tuned to make good power there's just no advantage other than sound or looks.I'm going with a de-catted stock header at this point.
OK so what I've learned here is basically what I already knew coming from the Dyna forum. If you want to make more power get a 2 into 1 if you want the look of dual exhaust without loosing power you need a cross over.The guy that did the Dyno on my Bob was a fan of true duals he claimed he could get better power out of them because it made it easier to tune each individual cylinder. He could put his exhaust Gas Analyzer in each pipe but...he was blown away by how much power my otherwise stock TC88 was making with just the Thunderheader SERT,and a SE air cleaner.I'm sure True Duals can be tuned to make good power there's just no advantage other than sound or looks.I'm going with a de-catted stock header at this point.
Who said sputtering? I sure didn't. I said it bogged down and started pinging. I didn't say a thing about sputtering. You are putting words in my mouth. The factory 07s barely had enough torque to pull 6th gear at 70MPH and they already ran very hot. Change something that decreases torque and sixth gear became unusable. I did have the bike on the dyno with the true duals and a tune but I have never had the bike on a dyno with the factory head pipes. The numbers were pretty dismal with the true duals on the bike. And that was with both a stage one map in the factory ECM and a tuned Thunder Max (Thunder Max was supposed to take care of the tune and get my torque back, it didn't). And, like I said it is a long complicated story that I don't want to get into in this thread.
I've run the gamut of different exhausts on stock, Stage 1, and hot rod motors. Anyone that tells you that TD's make the most power is misleading you at the very least. A good 2-1 will perform better than a true dual system. I've never said any different.
IF you had found a knowledgeable tune tech he could have adjusted your tune to make the most of your system no matter what it was. An incompetent tech's most often used answer is "those TD's are ruining your power".
Reading between the lines tells me that's likely what happened in your case too.
What a shame, 'cause you now have a pretty low regard for what is really a good exhaust system, particularly the stepped header versions.
Glad you like what you have now.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.