When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Kutter HD will be installing an Andrews 48 cam in my 2012 fugly ultra at the end of the month. Does anybody have any experience with this cam and what do you think of it? Thanks, Jim
Aside from that it is a cam much as the SE 255 except it goes a bit further before falling flat. It is better suited for and designed for a 96 CI motor, at least according to Andrews.
I just installed the 54 cams in my 2004 RK and it is like night and day from before. The 48 was designed as a drop in cam and if the OP has not done any headwork or increased the bore then the 48 is the cam for his bike. The 54's are also designed to run with an increased compression ratio that is in the 10:1 range. You have to look at the entire setup before choosing a cam. The numbers on paper don't tell the entire story. Later Fairshake
I would also look at the 57 for your bike, the 48 closes at 29 degrees with 222 degrees of intake duration, those 2 specs are not far from your stock cam, yes it will give you a little more but I would go a bit further and put the 57 in, I put SE 204 cams in mine and really like them.
thanks for the responses guys. no, it is not too late to change. I talked to the performance tech at Kutter and told him my riding style and he sugested the Andrews cam.I don't nor do I plan any head or motor work. I am looking for a little more torque when riding two up touring. I did install a fuel moto 2:1:2 head pipe and Roland Sands aircleaner, with Vance & Hines basic slip-on mufflers to try and cool it down a bit. Thats why i am asking now for other input, I have a couple weeks to decide.
It is not real fair to compare the 48 to the stock cam simply by when the intake closes. The 48 has .064 more lift and 24 more degrees duration and 36 more degrees of overlap. It is lots more close to the 57 than it is to the 255 also. With the riding style you are describing you would be happy with either the 48 or 57 or SE 204. It was designed for the 96 and the 57 for the 103. I personally would chose the 57 over either of the cams.
It is not real fair to compare the 48 to the stock cam simply by when the intake closes. The 48 has .064 more lift and 24 more degrees duration and 36 more degrees of overlap. It is lots more close to the 57 than it is to the 255 also. With the riding style you are describing you would be happy with either the 48 or 57 or SE 204. It was designed for the 96 and the 57 for the 103. I personally would chose the 57 over either of the cams.
One of the most important factors of reading a cam is when the intake closes, you can throw lift out the window because he is running stock heads, the 48 is a low rpm torque cam that will fall on its face and I am just giving my .02 since I have ridden on many different cams, my favorite is the SE 204, look at the numbers of the 57, is very close to the 204 in everything except lift and with stock heads anything with over .500 is not going to gain you anything, actually the 37 and 57 are exactly the same except lift, .510 to .560
Kutter HD will be installing an Andrews 48 cam in my 2012 fugly ultra at the end of the month. Does anybody have any experience with this cam and what do you think of it? Thanks, Jim
hey jim I went with 57-h in 2013 street glide I can't get over how hard they pull snappy down lower vary mellow hwy speeds
my set up tts master tune vh pro pipe 99 hp 107 tq dyno tuned
I just put the 48H in my 96" engine. Only have been able to ride it once about 30 miles, due to the horrible weather we are constantly having here. Was not as impressed as I wanted to be. It did seem better at low end but it did not seem to wind up rpm's as good as I thought it would. Only have extremely limited riding so far, but it seemed like it was all over at 3500 rpm's which is about what the stock cam was like. I need much more seat time to see how it does.
On the other hand I had no hesitations, low spots, or roughness, just smooth acceleration and a nice sound.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.